Comparing trends in infanticides in 28 countries, 1960–2009

Noora Ellonen, J. Kääriäinen, Martti Lehti, Mikko Aaltonen
{"title":"Comparing trends in infanticides in 28 countries, 1960–2009","authors":"Noora Ellonen, J. Kääriäinen, Martti Lehti, Mikko Aaltonen","doi":"10.1080/14043858.2015.1038905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The term ‘infanticide’ refers to the homicide of a child younger than one year old. In this article, we describe infanticide trends in 28 industrialized countries between 1960 and 2009. The analysis is based on the cause of death data from the WHO Mortality Database and national materials. The purpose is to compare those trends in all these 28 countries not to compare countries per se. Cause of death statistics are based on ICD classification. During the review period, ICD classification changed three times. In addition to describing infanticide trends, we will analyse the impact of those changes on statistical infanticide levels, to be sure that changes in trends could be seen as real, not statistical artefacts. According to our analysis, the change from ICD-7 to ICD-9 in 1968–1970 seems to have had some impact on registered infanticide mortality levels in three of the studied countries. In other countries, the changes did not have any general impact on registered infanticide levels. During the period, infanticide rates decreased in almost all European countries, and increased or were stable in most non-European industrialized countries. Even in Europe, there were significant differences in the decreasing trend between countries. We also found some structural variation behind the trend figures, which raised the question of whether the aggregated infanticide levels really describe an identical phenomenon in different countries.","PeriodicalId":88919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scandinavian studies in criminology and crime prevention","volume":"16 1","pages":"175 - 193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14043858.2015.1038905","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scandinavian studies in criminology and crime prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14043858.2015.1038905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

The term ‘infanticide’ refers to the homicide of a child younger than one year old. In this article, we describe infanticide trends in 28 industrialized countries between 1960 and 2009. The analysis is based on the cause of death data from the WHO Mortality Database and national materials. The purpose is to compare those trends in all these 28 countries not to compare countries per se. Cause of death statistics are based on ICD classification. During the review period, ICD classification changed three times. In addition to describing infanticide trends, we will analyse the impact of those changes on statistical infanticide levels, to be sure that changes in trends could be seen as real, not statistical artefacts. According to our analysis, the change from ICD-7 to ICD-9 in 1968–1970 seems to have had some impact on registered infanticide mortality levels in three of the studied countries. In other countries, the changes did not have any general impact on registered infanticide levels. During the period, infanticide rates decreased in almost all European countries, and increased or were stable in most non-European industrialized countries. Even in Europe, there were significant differences in the decreasing trend between countries. We also found some structural variation behind the trend figures, which raised the question of whether the aggregated infanticide levels really describe an identical phenomenon in different countries.
比较1960-2009年28个国家杀婴趋势
“杀婴”一词指的是杀害一岁以下的儿童。在这篇文章中,我们描述了1960年至2009年间28个工业化国家的杀婴趋势。该分析基于世卫组织死亡率数据库中的死亡原因数据和国家材料。目的是比较所有这28个国家的趋势,而不是比较国家本身。死亡原因统计基于ICD分类。在审查期间,ICD分类发生了三次变化。除了描述杀婴趋势之外,我们还将分析这些变化对统计杀婴水平的影响,以确保趋势的变化可以被视为真实的,而不是统计上的人工制品。根据我们的分析,1968-1970年从ICD-7到ICD-9的变化似乎对三个研究国家的登记杀婴死亡率水平产生了一些影响。在其他国家,这些变化对登记的杀婴率没有任何普遍影响。在此期间,几乎所有欧洲国家的杀婴率都有所下降,而大多数非欧洲工业化国家的杀婴率有所上升或保持稳定。即使在欧洲,各国之间的下降趋势也存在显著差异。我们还发现趋势数据背后存在一些结构性差异,这就提出了一个问题:在不同国家,合计的杀婴水平是否真的描述了一种相同的现象?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信