Relationships in healthcare and homelessness: Exploring solidarity

IF 1.1 Q3 SOCIAL WORK
A. Oudshoorn, C. Ward-Griffin, H. Berman, C. Forchuk, B. Poland
{"title":"Relationships in healthcare and homelessness: Exploring solidarity","authors":"A. Oudshoorn, C. Ward-Griffin, H. Berman, C. Forchuk, B. Poland","doi":"10.1080/10530789.2016.1254862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: People experiencing homelessness have some of the highest morbidity rates and lowest age of mortality in Canada yet face many barriers to care, in particular the attitudes of healthcare providers. Objectives: In this critical ethnographic study, power within client–provider relationships in health care with people experiencing homelessness is explored. Methods: Multiple qualitative methods of document analysis, participant observation, interviews, and focus groups were used with both clients and providers in a community clinic for people experiencing homelessness. Data analysis involved individual and team thematic analysis, guided by Lather's (2007, Getting lost: Feminist efforts towards a double(d) science. Albany, NY: SUNY Press) criteria for validity. Results: Caregiving relationships involve a negotiation of power based on the many differences of social location between clients and providers. Both clinic policies and personal practices influence the ways power is asserted, taken, or shared. Conclusions: In discussing the implications for addressing power relations in caregiving relationships, it is highlighted that most work in this area has focused on educating health professionals to assist them to relate in more appropriate ways. More needs to be done to actively address the power differentials inherent in caregiving with people experiencing homelessness, for which the concept of ‘solidarity’ is presented as offering some promise.","PeriodicalId":45390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10530789.2016.1254862","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10530789.2016.1254862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Background: People experiencing homelessness have some of the highest morbidity rates and lowest age of mortality in Canada yet face many barriers to care, in particular the attitudes of healthcare providers. Objectives: In this critical ethnographic study, power within client–provider relationships in health care with people experiencing homelessness is explored. Methods: Multiple qualitative methods of document analysis, participant observation, interviews, and focus groups were used with both clients and providers in a community clinic for people experiencing homelessness. Data analysis involved individual and team thematic analysis, guided by Lather's (2007, Getting lost: Feminist efforts towards a double(d) science. Albany, NY: SUNY Press) criteria for validity. Results: Caregiving relationships involve a negotiation of power based on the many differences of social location between clients and providers. Both clinic policies and personal practices influence the ways power is asserted, taken, or shared. Conclusions: In discussing the implications for addressing power relations in caregiving relationships, it is highlighted that most work in this area has focused on educating health professionals to assist them to relate in more appropriate ways. More needs to be done to actively address the power differentials inherent in caregiving with people experiencing homelessness, for which the concept of ‘solidarity’ is presented as offering some promise.
医疗保健和无家可归者之间的关系:探索团结
背景:经历无家可归的人有一些最高的发病率和最低的年龄死亡率在加拿大,但面临许多障碍护理,特别是卫生保健提供者的态度。目的:在这个关键的民族志研究中,探讨了与无家可归者的医疗保健客户-提供者关系中的权力。方法:采用文献分析、参与观察、访谈和焦点小组等多种定性方法,对无家可归者社区诊所的服务对象和提供者进行调查。数据分析包括个人和团队主题分析,以Lather(2007)的《迷失:女权主义者对双重(d)科学的努力》为指导。奥尔巴尼,纽约:纽约州立大学出版社)有效性标准。结果:护理关系涉及到一种基于社会地位差异的权力谈判。诊所政策和个人实践都会影响权力的主张、获取或分享方式。结论:在讨论解决照顾关系中的权力关系的影响时,强调这一领域的大多数工作都侧重于教育卫生专业人员,以帮助他们以更适当的方式建立关系。需要做更多的工作,积极解决照顾无家可归者所固有的权力差异,“团结”的概念被认为提供了一些希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
14.30%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信