Joint estimation of angler revealed preference site selection and stated preference choice experiment recreation data considering attribute non-attendance

IF 1.9 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Paul R. Hindsley, C. Landry, K. Schnier, J. Whitehead, M. Zarei
{"title":"Joint estimation of angler revealed preference site selection and stated preference choice experiment recreation data considering attribute non-attendance","authors":"Paul R. Hindsley, C. Landry, K. Schnier, J. Whitehead, M. Zarei","doi":"10.1080/21606544.2022.2077840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We estimate angler demand models with revealed preference (RP) and stated preference (SP) site selection marine recreational fishing data. We combine RP data from the Marine Recreational Information Program (MRIP) creel survey with SP discrete choice experiment survey data from 2003/2004. There are eight SP trip decisions and one RP trip decision for each of 1928 anglers who provided enough information to be analysed. Joint RP-SP generalized multinomial logit models are estimated. We find that the SP travel cost coefficient is much lower than the RP travel cost coefficient in absolute value, suggesting hypothetical bias in the SP data. This difference is reflected in the willingness to pay estimates, where the SP estimates for improved catch are much higher than the RP estimates. We use inferred attribute non-attendance (ANA) methods to identify respondents who may be ignoring the SP cost variable. The SP cost coefficient accounting for ANA is much higher in absolute value than the SP coefficient from the model that does not account for ANA. The ANA model indicates much more consistency between the RP and SP data. The smaller difference in the travel cost coefficients is also reflected in the willingness to pay estimates.","PeriodicalId":44903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy","volume":"12 1","pages":"44 - 62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2022.2077840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT We estimate angler demand models with revealed preference (RP) and stated preference (SP) site selection marine recreational fishing data. We combine RP data from the Marine Recreational Information Program (MRIP) creel survey with SP discrete choice experiment survey data from 2003/2004. There are eight SP trip decisions and one RP trip decision for each of 1928 anglers who provided enough information to be analysed. Joint RP-SP generalized multinomial logit models are estimated. We find that the SP travel cost coefficient is much lower than the RP travel cost coefficient in absolute value, suggesting hypothetical bias in the SP data. This difference is reflected in the willingness to pay estimates, where the SP estimates for improved catch are much higher than the RP estimates. We use inferred attribute non-attendance (ANA) methods to identify respondents who may be ignoring the SP cost variable. The SP cost coefficient accounting for ANA is much higher in absolute value than the SP coefficient from the model that does not account for ANA. The ANA model indicates much more consistency between the RP and SP data. The smaller difference in the travel cost coefficients is also reflected in the willingness to pay estimates.
考虑属性缺席的垂钓者显示偏好选址和陈述偏好实验游憩数据的联合估计
摘要:本文利用揭示偏好(RP)和陈述偏好(SP)的海洋休闲垂钓选址数据估计垂钓者需求模型。我们将2003/2004年海洋娱乐信息计划(MRIP)的网格调查的RP数据与SP离散选择实验调查数据相结合。1928名垂钓者提供了足够的信息进行分析,每位垂钓者有8次SP下钻决策和1次RP下钻决策。对联合RP-SP广义多项式模型进行了估计。我们发现,SP出行成本系数的绝对值远低于RP出行成本系数,说明SP数据存在假设偏差。这一差异反映在支付估算费用的意愿上,对改进捕获量的SP估计远高于RP估计。我们使用推断属性不出席(ANA)方法来识别可能忽略SP成本变量的受访者。考虑ANA的SP成本系数绝对值远高于不考虑ANA模型的SP系数。ANA模型表明RP和SP数据之间的一致性更高。旅费系数的较小差别也反映在支付估计数的意愿上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信