Intricate Readings: Machiavelli, Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas

IF 0.1 2区 艺术学 0 ART
C. Ginzburg
{"title":"Intricate Readings: Machiavelli, Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas","authors":"C. Ginzburg","doi":"10.1086/JWCI26321952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machiavelli (as most scholars agree) read Aristotle's Politics. But in which edition? The article argues that Machiavelli used the edition published in Rome in 1492, in which the Latin translation of Aristotle by Leonardo Bruni was accompanied by a commentary traditionally ascibed to Thomas Aquinas (in fact, written by Peter of Auvergne). The article explores the impact of this triple filter (Aristotele, 'Aquinas', Bruni) on Machiavelli's approach to politics.","PeriodicalId":45703,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE WARBURG AND COURTAULD INSTITUTES","volume":"78 1","pages":"157 - 172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE WARBURG AND COURTAULD INSTITUTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/JWCI26321952","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Machiavelli (as most scholars agree) read Aristotle's Politics. But in which edition? The article argues that Machiavelli used the edition published in Rome in 1492, in which the Latin translation of Aristotle by Leonardo Bruni was accompanied by a commentary traditionally ascibed to Thomas Aquinas (in fact, written by Peter of Auvergne). The article explores the impact of this triple filter (Aristotele, 'Aquinas', Bruni) on Machiavelli's approach to politics.
复杂阅读:马基雅维利,亚里士多德,托马斯·阿奎那
马基雅维利(大多数学者都同意)读过亚里士多德的《政治学》。但是是哪个版本呢?这篇文章认为,马基雅维利使用了1492年在罗马出版的版本,在这个版本中,列奥纳多·布鲁尼(Leonardo Bruni)对亚里士多德的拉丁文翻译附有一篇传统上是对托马斯·阿奎那(Thomas Aquinas)的评论(实际上是由奥弗涅的彼得(Peter of Auvergne)撰写的)。本文探讨了这三重过滤器(亚里士多德,“阿奎那”,布鲁尼)对马基雅维利的政治方法的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信