Health-related quality of life among women with ductal carcinoma in situ or early invasive breast cancer: validation of the FACT-B (version 4)

E. Hahn, E. Segawa, K. Kaiser, D. Cella, Benjamin D. Smith
{"title":"Health-related quality of life among women with ductal carcinoma in situ or early invasive breast cancer: validation of the FACT-B (version 4)","authors":"E. Hahn, E. Segawa, K. Kaiser, D. Cella, Benjamin D. Smith","doi":"10.1080/23809000.2016.1134259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objectives: To examine the reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) Version 4. Methods: Women ≥ 40 years with DCIS or early invasive breast cancer treated with whole breast irradiation (n=280) completed patient-reported outcome measures at three time points. Results: Most internal consistency reliability coefficients were 0.70 or greater. At baseline and 6 months, mean FACT-B scores were comparable between physician-reported cosmetic outcome subgroups; at 12 months, most scores were higher (better) for the “excellent” cosmesis group compared to “poor/fair/good” (p<0.05). Most mean FACT-B scores were higher for those with Grade 0-1 CTCAE toxicities versus Grade 2-3 (p<0.05). There were medium to large correlations between the FACT-B and the Body Image Scale. Most FACT-B mean scores were significantly different across BIS change groups (p<0.05). Conclusions: The FACT-B exhibited good reliability and validity in this sample of 280 women treated for DCIS and early invasive breast cancer.","PeriodicalId":91681,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of quality of life in cancer care","volume":"1 1","pages":"109 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23809000.2016.1134259","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of quality of life in cancer care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23809000.2016.1134259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives: To examine the reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) Version 4. Methods: Women ≥ 40 years with DCIS or early invasive breast cancer treated with whole breast irradiation (n=280) completed patient-reported outcome measures at three time points. Results: Most internal consistency reliability coefficients were 0.70 or greater. At baseline and 6 months, mean FACT-B scores were comparable between physician-reported cosmetic outcome subgroups; at 12 months, most scores were higher (better) for the “excellent” cosmesis group compared to “poor/fair/good” (p<0.05). Most mean FACT-B scores were higher for those with Grade 0-1 CTCAE toxicities versus Grade 2-3 (p<0.05). There were medium to large correlations between the FACT-B and the Body Image Scale. Most FACT-B mean scores were significantly different across BIS change groups (p<0.05). Conclusions: The FACT-B exhibited good reliability and validity in this sample of 280 women treated for DCIS and early invasive breast cancer.
导管原位癌或早期浸润性乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量:FACT-B(第4版)的验证
目的:检验Cancer Therapy-Breast功能评估(FACT-B) Version 4的信度和效度。方法:年龄≥40岁的DCIS或早期浸润性乳腺癌接受全乳照射治疗的女性(n=280)在三个时间点完成了患者报告的结果测量。结果:大部分内部一致性信度系数大于等于0.70。在基线和6个月时,医生报告的美容结果亚组之间的平均FACT-B评分具有可比性;在12个月时,“优秀”化妆组的大多数评分高于“差/一般/良好”化妆组(p<0.05)。0-1级CTCAE毒性患者的平均FACT-B评分高于2-3级CTCAE毒性患者(p<0.05)。在FACT-B和身体形象量表之间存在中等到较大的相关性。大多数FACT-B平均评分在BIS变化组之间差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。结论:在280名接受DCIS和早期浸润性乳腺癌治疗的女性样本中,FACT-B显示出良好的信度和效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信