Mayo registry for telemetry efficacy in arrest (MR TEA) study: An assessment of the effect of admission diagnosis on outcomes from in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest

D. Snipelisky, J. Ray, G. Matcha, A. Roy, Brooke Clark, Adrian G. Dumitrascu, Veronica Bosworth, Anastasia Whitman, Patricia C. Lewis, T. Vadeboncoeur, F. Kusumoto, Caroline Burton
{"title":"Mayo registry for telemetry efficacy in arrest (MR TEA) study: An assessment of the effect of admission diagnosis on outcomes from in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest","authors":"D. Snipelisky, J. Ray, G. Matcha, A. Roy, Brooke Clark, Adrian G. Dumitrascu, Veronica Bosworth, Anastasia Whitman, Patricia C. Lewis, T. Vadeboncoeur, F. Kusumoto, Caroline Burton","doi":"10.1080/17482941.2016.1203439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Little data exists evaluating how different risk factors influence outcomes following in-hospital arrests. Methods: A retrospective review of patients that suffered a cardiopulmonary arrest between 1 May 2008 and 30 June 2014 was performed. Patients were stratified into subsets based on cardiac versus non-cardiac reasons for admission. Results: 199 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 138 (69.3%) had a non-cardiac reason for admission and 61 (30.7%) a cardiac etiology. No difference in demographics and non-cardiac comorbidities were present. Cardiac-related comorbidities were more prevalent in the cardiac etiology subset. Arrests with a shockable rhythm were more common in the cardiac group (P < 0.0001), yet return of spontaneous circulation from the index event was similar (P = 0.254). More patients in the cardiac group were alive at 24-h post resuscitation (n = 34, 55.7% versus n = 49, 35.5%; P = 0.0085), discharge (n = 21, 34.4% versus n = 19, 13.8%; P = 0.0018), and at last follow-up (n = 13, 21.3% versus n = 14, 10.1%; P = 0.0434). Conclusion: Although patients with cardiac and non-cardiac etiologies for admission have similar rates of return of spontaneous circulation, those with cardiac etiologies are more likely to survive to hospital discharge and outpatient follow-up.","PeriodicalId":87385,"journal":{"name":"Acute cardiac care","volume":"12 1","pages":"67 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17482941.2016.1203439","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute cardiac care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17482941.2016.1203439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Little data exists evaluating how different risk factors influence outcomes following in-hospital arrests. Methods: A retrospective review of patients that suffered a cardiopulmonary arrest between 1 May 2008 and 30 June 2014 was performed. Patients were stratified into subsets based on cardiac versus non-cardiac reasons for admission. Results: 199 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 138 (69.3%) had a non-cardiac reason for admission and 61 (30.7%) a cardiac etiology. No difference in demographics and non-cardiac comorbidities were present. Cardiac-related comorbidities were more prevalent in the cardiac etiology subset. Arrests with a shockable rhythm were more common in the cardiac group (P < 0.0001), yet return of spontaneous circulation from the index event was similar (P = 0.254). More patients in the cardiac group were alive at 24-h post resuscitation (n = 34, 55.7% versus n = 49, 35.5%; P = 0.0085), discharge (n = 21, 34.4% versus n = 19, 13.8%; P = 0.0018), and at last follow-up (n = 13, 21.3% versus n = 14, 10.1%; P = 0.0434). Conclusion: Although patients with cardiac and non-cardiac etiologies for admission have similar rates of return of spontaneous circulation, those with cardiac etiologies are more likely to survive to hospital discharge and outpatient follow-up.
梅奥远程监测停搏疗效登记处(MR TEA)研究:入院诊断对院内心肺骤停结局影响的评估
导言:很少有数据评估不同的风险因素如何影响院内逮捕后的结果。方法:回顾性分析2008年5月1日至2014年6月30日期间发生心肺骤停的患者。根据入院的心脏和非心脏原因将患者分层为亚群。结果:199例患者符合入选标准,其中138例(69.3%)为非心脏原因入院,61例(30.7%)为心脏病因。在人口统计学和非心脏合并症方面没有差异。心脏相关合并症在心脏病因亚组中更为普遍。伴有震荡性心律的骤停在心脏组更常见(P < 0.0001),但指数事件后的自发循环恢复相似(P = 0.254)。心脏组在复苏后24小时存活的患者较多(n = 34, 55.7% vs n = 49, 35.5%;P = 0.0085),出院(n = 21, 34.4%对n = 19, 13.8%;P = 0.0018)和最后一次随访(n = 13, 21.3%对n = 14, 10.1%;P = 0.0434)。结论:虽然入院时心脏和非心脏病因的患者自发循环恢复率相似,但心脏病因的患者更有可能存活到出院和门诊随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信