Hospitalist-vascular surgery comanagement: effects on complications and mortality

Colin T Iberti, A. Briones, Erin Gabriel, A. Dunn
{"title":"Hospitalist-vascular surgery comanagement: effects on complications and mortality","authors":"Colin T Iberti, A. Briones, Erin Gabriel, A. Dunn","doi":"10.1080/21548331.2016.1259543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objectives: Hospitalized vascular surgery patients have multiple severe comorbidities, poor functional status, and high perioperative cardiac risk. Thus they may be ideal patients for a collaborative care model. However, there is little evidence for a comanagement model on clinical outcomes. Methods: The two-year pre-post study consisted of a comanagement model where a hospitalist actively participated in the medical care of American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status Classification scale 3 or 4 vascular surgery patients. Outcomes were in-hospital mortality, length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, pain scores, and patient safety metrics. Results: With comanagement, patient complications decreased from 3.5 to 2.2 events per 1000 patients. (p = 0.045). Mortality decreased from 2.01% to 1.00% (p = 0.049), corresponding to a decrease in the risk-adjusted observed to expected mortality rate ratio from 1.22 to 0.53 (p = 0.01). Patient reported pain scores improved; more patients in the comanagement cohort expressed no pain (72% vs 82.8%; p = 0.01) and there were reductions in reports of mild and moderate pain. There was no significant difference in the risk-adjusted length of stay (observed to expected ratio 0.83 to 0.88 for the pre-intervention and comanagement groups, respectively, p = 0.48). The 30-day readmission rate was unchanged (21.9 vs 20.6% p = 0.44). Patients in the intervention period were more clinically complex, as evidenced by the greater case mix index (2.21 vs 2.44). Conclusions: After two years of implementation, our comanagement service reduced complications, mortality, and pain scores among high-risk vascular surgery patients.","PeriodicalId":75913,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice","volume":"44 1","pages":"233 - 236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21548331.2016.1259543","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2016.1259543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives: Hospitalized vascular surgery patients have multiple severe comorbidities, poor functional status, and high perioperative cardiac risk. Thus they may be ideal patients for a collaborative care model. However, there is little evidence for a comanagement model on clinical outcomes. Methods: The two-year pre-post study consisted of a comanagement model where a hospitalist actively participated in the medical care of American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status Classification scale 3 or 4 vascular surgery patients. Outcomes were in-hospital mortality, length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, pain scores, and patient safety metrics. Results: With comanagement, patient complications decreased from 3.5 to 2.2 events per 1000 patients. (p = 0.045). Mortality decreased from 2.01% to 1.00% (p = 0.049), corresponding to a decrease in the risk-adjusted observed to expected mortality rate ratio from 1.22 to 0.53 (p = 0.01). Patient reported pain scores improved; more patients in the comanagement cohort expressed no pain (72% vs 82.8%; p = 0.01) and there were reductions in reports of mild and moderate pain. There was no significant difference in the risk-adjusted length of stay (observed to expected ratio 0.83 to 0.88 for the pre-intervention and comanagement groups, respectively, p = 0.48). The 30-day readmission rate was unchanged (21.9 vs 20.6% p = 0.44). Patients in the intervention period were more clinically complex, as evidenced by the greater case mix index (2.21 vs 2.44). Conclusions: After two years of implementation, our comanagement service reduced complications, mortality, and pain scores among high-risk vascular surgery patients.
住院医师血管手术管理:对并发症和死亡率的影响
目的:血管外科住院患者存在多种严重合并症,功能状态差,围手术期心脏风险高。因此,他们可能是合作护理模式的理想患者。然而,很少有证据表明临床结果的管理模式。方法:采用一名住院医师积极参与美国麻醉医师协会身体状态分类量表3、4例血管手术患者医疗护理的管理模式,进行为期两年的前后研究。结果包括住院死亡率、住院时间、30天再入院率、疼痛评分和患者安全指标。结果:通过管理,患者并发症从每1000例患者3.5例下降到2.2例。(p = 0.045)。死亡率从2.01%降至1.00% (p = 0.049),对应于经风险调整的观察死亡率与预期死亡率之比从1.22降至0.53 (p = 0.01)。患者报告的疼痛评分改善;管理组中更多的患者没有疼痛(72% vs 82.8%;P = 0.01),轻度和中度疼痛的报告有所减少。经风险调整后的住院时间没有显著差异(干预前组和管理组的观察比和预期比分别为0.83和0.88,p = 0.48)。30天再入院率不变(21.9 vs 20.6% p = 0.44)。干预期患者的临床复杂程度更高,病例混合指数更高(2.21 vs 2.44)。结论:经过两年的实施,我们的管理服务降低了高危血管手术患者的并发症、死亡率和疼痛评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信