Current and developing strategies for monitoring and reversing direct oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

A. Sarma, R. Giugliano
{"title":"Current and developing strategies for monitoring and reversing direct oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation","authors":"A. Sarma, R. Giugliano","doi":"10.1080/21548331.2015.1103190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: In light of the increasing clinical utilization of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, this review evaluates strategies for monitoring and reversing the anticoagulant effect of these agents. Methods: We summarize the data currently available for laboratory monitoring and reversal of DOACs. Relevant literature was identified using search terms pertaining to oral anticoagulants, reversal agents, and laboratory monitoring using Pubmed, clinicaltrials.gov, and abstracts from recent major cardiovascular meetings. Results: Significant user appeal for the DOACs stems from the reliable pharmacokinetics of these agents, which render routine laboratory monitoring unnecessary for general use, as well as lower rates of bleeding as compared to warfarin. However, readily available laboratory tests have not been clinically validated for use with these agents. The ability to measure the anticoagulant effect of a DOAC in selected situations (e.g. serious bleeding, overanticoagulation, emergent procedures, and compliance monitoring) remains an unmet clinical need. Further, there is a paucity of data to guide treatment in patients receiving DOACs who experience a serious hemorrhage. Conclusion: While evidence-based recommendations cannot be definitively provided for management of DOAC-related bleeding events at present, several targeted reversal agents are currently in development, and hold promise for solving this important clinical problem.","PeriodicalId":75913,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice","volume":"43 1","pages":"258 - 267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21548331.2015.1103190","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2015.1103190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Objective: In light of the increasing clinical utilization of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, this review evaluates strategies for monitoring and reversing the anticoagulant effect of these agents. Methods: We summarize the data currently available for laboratory monitoring and reversal of DOACs. Relevant literature was identified using search terms pertaining to oral anticoagulants, reversal agents, and laboratory monitoring using Pubmed, clinicaltrials.gov, and abstracts from recent major cardiovascular meetings. Results: Significant user appeal for the DOACs stems from the reliable pharmacokinetics of these agents, which render routine laboratory monitoring unnecessary for general use, as well as lower rates of bleeding as compared to warfarin. However, readily available laboratory tests have not been clinically validated for use with these agents. The ability to measure the anticoagulant effect of a DOAC in selected situations (e.g. serious bleeding, overanticoagulation, emergent procedures, and compliance monitoring) remains an unmet clinical need. Further, there is a paucity of data to guide treatment in patients receiving DOACs who experience a serious hemorrhage. Conclusion: While evidence-based recommendations cannot be definitively provided for management of DOAC-related bleeding events at present, several targeted reversal agents are currently in development, and hold promise for solving this important clinical problem.
非瓣膜性心房颤动患者直接口服抗凝药物的监测和逆转策略的现状和发展
摘要目的:鉴于非瓣膜性心房颤动患者口服直接抗凝剂(DOACs)的临床应用越来越多,本综述评估了这些药物的监测和逆转抗凝作用的策略。方法:总结目前实验室监测和DOACs逆转的资料。使用与口服抗凝剂、逆转剂和实验室监测相关的搜索词,检索Pubmed、clinicaltrials.gov和最近主要心血管会议的摘要,确定相关文献。结果:DOACs的显著用户吸引力源于这些药物的可靠药代动力学,这使得常规的实验室监测对于一般使用来说是不必要的,并且与华法林相比出血率更低。然而,现成的实验室测试尚未被临床验证与这些药物一起使用。在特定情况下(如严重出血、过度抗凝、紧急手术和依从性监测)测量DOAC抗凝效果的能力仍未满足临床需求。此外,缺乏数据来指导接受doac治疗的严重出血患者的治疗。结论:虽然目前尚不能为doac相关出血事件的治疗提供明确的循证建议,但目前正在开发几种靶向逆转药物,有望解决这一重要的临床问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信