M. Bhuvanesh Kumar, J. Antony, E. Cudney, S. Furterer, J. Garza‐Reyes, S. Senthil
{"title":"Decision-making through fuzzy TOPSIS and COPRAS approaches for lean tools selection: A case study of automotive accessories manufacturing industry","authors":"M. Bhuvanesh Kumar, J. Antony, E. Cudney, S. Furterer, J. Garza‐Reyes, S. Senthil","doi":"10.1080/17509653.2022.2064356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Similarity in prioritization of lean tools (LTs) by different frameworks on the same problem is a point of contention. The goal of the present research is to address LT selection problem through two commonly used multi-criteria decision-making approaches, namely the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and complex proportional assessment (COPRAS). A framework involving value stream mapping and plant layout through TOPSIS and COPRAS approaches to find the best possible LTs for an automotive accessories manufacturing plant is developed and assessed in this research. The obtained similarity of rankings betweenTOPSIS and COPRAS is 71.42%, and the difference is 28.58%. Based on the assessment, systematic layout planning (SLP) is selected as the most suitable LT and its implementation is elaborated in detail. Significant reductions were obtained in lead time (16.44%), non-value added time (61.03%), transportation distances (40.42%), and waiting time (86%). Additionally, lean implementation resulted in reduced inventory, reduced internal traffic, improved productivity, and improved customer service. The LT selection framework presented in this research work addresses the computational complexity associated with the existing models and allows the segregation of the most preferable and the least preferable criteria which eliminate the criteria weight generation methods.","PeriodicalId":46578,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management","volume":"7 1","pages":"26 - 35"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2022.2064356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
ABSTRACT Similarity in prioritization of lean tools (LTs) by different frameworks on the same problem is a point of contention. The goal of the present research is to address LT selection problem through two commonly used multi-criteria decision-making approaches, namely the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and complex proportional assessment (COPRAS). A framework involving value stream mapping and plant layout through TOPSIS and COPRAS approaches to find the best possible LTs for an automotive accessories manufacturing plant is developed and assessed in this research. The obtained similarity of rankings betweenTOPSIS and COPRAS is 71.42%, and the difference is 28.58%. Based on the assessment, systematic layout planning (SLP) is selected as the most suitable LT and its implementation is elaborated in detail. Significant reductions were obtained in lead time (16.44%), non-value added time (61.03%), transportation distances (40.42%), and waiting time (86%). Additionally, lean implementation resulted in reduced inventory, reduced internal traffic, improved productivity, and improved customer service. The LT selection framework presented in this research work addresses the computational complexity associated with the existing models and allows the segregation of the most preferable and the least preferable criteria which eliminate the criteria weight generation methods.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management (IJMSEM) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that provides an international forum for researchers and practitioners of management science and engineering management. The journal focuses on identifying problems in the field, and using innovative management theories and new management methods to provide solutions. IJMSEM is committed to providing a platform for researchers and practitioners of management science and engineering management to share experiences and communicate ideas. Articles published in IJMSEM contain fresh information and approaches. They provide key information that will contribute to new scientific inquiries and improve competency, efficiency, and productivity in the field. IJMSEM focuses on the following: 1. identifying Management Science problems in engineering; 2. using management theory and methods to solve above problems innovatively and effectively; 3. developing new management theory and method to the newly emerged management issues in engineering; IJMSEM prefers papers with practical background, clear problem description, understandable physical and mathematical model, physical model with practical significance and theoretical framework, operable algorithm and successful practical applications. IJMSEM also takes into account management papers of original contributions in one or several aspects of these elements.