Co-Occurring Conditions Clients and Counselors Compare 12-Step and Smart Recovery Mutual Help

Patricia E. Penn, D. Brooke, A. Brooks, S. Gallagher, Allison D. Barnard
{"title":"Co-Occurring Conditions Clients and Counselors Compare 12-Step and Smart Recovery Mutual Help","authors":"Patricia E. Penn, D. Brooke, A. Brooks, S. Gallagher, Allison D. Barnard","doi":"10.1080/1556035X.2015.1104643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT There are few published accounts describing the perspectives of persons with co-occurring conditions (CC) of serious mental illness and substance use disorders, despite the high prevalence of CC. Two focus groups were conducted with CC clients (n = 12) and counselors (n = 7) who had experience with two common types of mutual-help meetings: 12-step meetings and Self-Management and Recovery Training (SMART) Recovery®. In both groups, there were positive comments about both modalities, but there were relatively more negative comments about 12-step programs. Many positive comments related to the experience of being in a meeting, regardless of modality. The results suggest that persons with CC who are currently in treatment generally respond better to SMART Recovery than to 12-step mutual-help meetings.","PeriodicalId":88011,"journal":{"name":"Journal of groups in addiction & recovery","volume":"11 1","pages":"76 - 92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1556035X.2015.1104643","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of groups in addiction & recovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1556035X.2015.1104643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT There are few published accounts describing the perspectives of persons with co-occurring conditions (CC) of serious mental illness and substance use disorders, despite the high prevalence of CC. Two focus groups were conducted with CC clients (n = 12) and counselors (n = 7) who had experience with two common types of mutual-help meetings: 12-step meetings and Self-Management and Recovery Training (SMART) Recovery®. In both groups, there were positive comments about both modalities, but there were relatively more negative comments about 12-step programs. Many positive comments related to the experience of being in a meeting, regardless of modality. The results suggest that persons with CC who are currently in treatment generally respond better to SMART Recovery than to 12-step mutual-help meetings.
共同发生的情况客户和咨询师比较12步和智能康复互助
摘要:尽管严重精神疾病和物质使用障碍的共存状况(CC)患病率很高,但很少有报道描述CC患者的观点。我们对CC患者(n = 12)和咨询师(n = 7)进行了两个焦点小组的研究,他们都有两种常见的互助会议的经验:12步会议和自我管理和恢复训练(SMART)康复®。在两组中,对两种方式都有积极的评价,但对12步疗法的负面评价相对较多。许多积极的评论都与参加会议的经历有关,无论会议的形式如何。结果表明,目前正在接受治疗的CC患者对SMART康复的反应通常比12步互助会更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信