Why Has America Produced so Few Eloquent Orators in Recent Years? The Ancient Roman Marcus Tullius Cicero Gives Us the Answer and the Remedy

IF 0.7 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
R. Enos
{"title":"Why Has America Produced so Few Eloquent Orators in Recent Years? The Ancient Roman Marcus Tullius Cicero Gives Us the Answer and the Remedy","authors":"R. Enos","doi":"10.1080/07350198.2023.2180578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the spirit of our Burkean Parlor, I hope that readers will see my remarks as extending the conversation that was initiated by Ryan Skinnell’s excellent essay “Bad People Speaking Effectively in the History of Rhetoric.” His essay appeared in “Octalog IV: The Politics of Rhetorical Studies in 2021” (Rhetoric Review 40.4: 337-40). Skinnell’s insightful statement did what all such Octalog essays seek to do: stimulate the reader to think about the rhetorical topic. My thoughts on this topic take a somewhat different approach but, I hope, one that will provide readers with another perspective for even further discussion. My thanks to Ryan Skinnell for his engaging contribution and Editor Elise V. Hurley for her support.","PeriodicalId":44627,"journal":{"name":"Rhetoric Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhetoric Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198.2023.2180578","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the spirit of our Burkean Parlor, I hope that readers will see my remarks as extending the conversation that was initiated by Ryan Skinnell’s excellent essay “Bad People Speaking Effectively in the History of Rhetoric.” His essay appeared in “Octalog IV: The Politics of Rhetorical Studies in 2021” (Rhetoric Review 40.4: 337-40). Skinnell’s insightful statement did what all such Octalog essays seek to do: stimulate the reader to think about the rhetorical topic. My thoughts on this topic take a somewhat different approach but, I hope, one that will provide readers with another perspective for even further discussion. My thanks to Ryan Skinnell for his engaging contribution and Editor Elise V. Hurley for her support.
为什么美国近年来很少有雄辩家?古罗马人马库斯·图利乌斯·西塞罗给了我们答案和补救办法
本着我们伯克肯会客室的精神,我希望读者能把我的评论看作是对瑞安·斯金奈尔的优秀文章《修辞学史上的坏人有效说话》所引发的对话的延伸。论文发表于《八篇四:2021年修辞研究的政治》(修辞评论40.4:337-40)。斯金奈尔富有洞察力的陈述达到了所有八进制文章的目的:激发读者对修辞主题的思考。我对这个话题的看法有些不同,但我希望,这将为读者提供进一步讨论的另一种视角。我要感谢Ryan skinner所做的贡献以及Elise V. Hurley编辑的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rhetoric Review
Rhetoric Review Multiple-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Rhetoric Review (RR), a scholarly interdisciplinary journal of rhetoric, publishes in all areas of rhetoric and writing and provides a professional forum for its readers to consider and discuss current topics and issues. The journal publishes manuscripts that explore the breadth and depth of the discipline, including history, theory, writing, praxis, philosophy, professional writing, rhetorical criticism, cultural studies, multiple literacies, technology, literature, public address, graduate education, and professional issues. Rhetoric Review also invites readers to contribute to the Burkean Parlor, a discourse forum for discussion of Rhetoric Review"s published articles, as well as professional issues. Essay reviews, commissioned by the editor, are included as a regular feature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信