Globalization and Policy Convergence: Symposium Overview

IF 3.9 3区 管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
G. Hoberg
{"title":"Globalization and Policy Convergence: Symposium Overview","authors":"G. Hoberg","doi":"10.1080/13876980108412657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the great questions of our time is the capacity of nation states to maintain distinctive policies in the face of globalization. To many, the intensification of international trade, the mobility of capital, and the circulation of ideas has put immense pressure on governments to reduce taxes, relax business regulations, and generally conform policies to international standards. A growing body of scholarship, however, emphasizes the continued flexibility of nations to tailor domestic policies to suit their own needs. At the outset, it is important to differentiate policy convergence—the process of policies across countries becoming increasingly alike—from the effects of international economic integration. Banting, Hoberg, and Simeon (1997) have developed a framework that distinguishes the variety of forces at work. They emphasize four major forces behind convergence:","PeriodicalId":47229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis","volume":"3 1","pages":"127-132"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2001-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13876980108412657","citationCount":"53","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980108412657","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

Abstract

One of the great questions of our time is the capacity of nation states to maintain distinctive policies in the face of globalization. To many, the intensification of international trade, the mobility of capital, and the circulation of ideas has put immense pressure on governments to reduce taxes, relax business regulations, and generally conform policies to international standards. A growing body of scholarship, however, emphasizes the continued flexibility of nations to tailor domestic policies to suit their own needs. At the outset, it is important to differentiate policy convergence—the process of policies across countries becoming increasingly alike—from the effects of international economic integration. Banting, Hoberg, and Simeon (1997) have developed a framework that distinguishes the variety of forces at work. They emphasize four major forces behind convergence:
全球化与政策趋同:研讨会综述
我们这个时代的一个重大问题是,面对全球化,民族国家是否有能力保持独特的政策。对许多人来说,国际贸易的加剧、资本的流动和思想的传播给政府带来了巨大的压力,迫使它们减少税收、放松商业法规,并使政策总体上符合国际标准。然而,越来越多的学者强调,各国在调整国内政策以适应自身需求方面仍具有灵活性。首先,重要的是将政策趋同——国家间政策日益趋同的过程——与国际经济一体化的影响区分开来。Banting, Hoberg和Simeon(1997)开发了一个框架来区分工作中的各种力量。他们强调了趋同背后的四大力量:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信