Editorial Notes

Andrew Sayer, Evangelia Tastsoglou, Jacinthe Michaud
{"title":"Editorial Notes","authors":"Andrew Sayer, Evangelia Tastsoglou, Jacinthe Michaud","doi":"10.1080/19187033.2000.11675250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Challenging the Status Quo The articles in this issue share a common dynamic: a challenge to the status quo. In the case of Andrew Sayer, the status quo of political economy itself is challenged. He argues that radical political economy has increasingly come to reflect the extent to which the lifeworld is dominated by economistic rationality. To rejuvenate its critical positioning, Sayer proposes a revival of the concept of moral economy by turning questions of economic behaviour into normative questions of validity. This means broadening analysis out from questions about how economic systems work, to questions about what they are for. From Sayer's viewpoint, values are not beyond the scope of critical inquiry and debate. In raising questions about the normative context of economic activity, Sayer positions himself alongside other contemporary arguments about the need to reintegrate the economic with social phenomenon, and to recognize, challenge and develop the moral character of economies. Kiran Mirchandani and Evangelia Tastsoglou s article tackles the concept of ''tolerance,'' its place in the construction of Canadian identity and multiculturalism, and in the continuation of a racist, homophobic status quo. Their analysis uses the reporting of \"tolerance\" regarding \"minority groups\" in Canadian news media to show the strong link between the celebration of tolerance and the acceptance of inequality and oppression. This tolerance is central to Canadian multiculturalism policies and the exclusionary construction of the Canadian \"national self.\" Mirchandani and Tastsoglou note, however, that tolerance is constructed as limited, thus protecting the status quo. This minimalist approach to tolerance, and the policy of multiculturalism which frames it, is contrasted with integrative anti-racism. In arguing for a diversity beyond tolerance, the authors place as central the systemic character of racism and the requirement of an action orientation. The authors conclude with detailed illustrations of the major contrasts between tolerance and integrative anti-racism. The articles by Katherine Teghtsoonian and Jacinthe Michaud engage with the gendered dimensions of policy development at","PeriodicalId":87064,"journal":{"name":"Bristol medico-chirurgical journal (1883)","volume":"33 1","pages":"193 - 196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19187033.2000.11675250","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bristol medico-chirurgical journal (1883)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19187033.2000.11675250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Challenging the Status Quo The articles in this issue share a common dynamic: a challenge to the status quo. In the case of Andrew Sayer, the status quo of political economy itself is challenged. He argues that radical political economy has increasingly come to reflect the extent to which the lifeworld is dominated by economistic rationality. To rejuvenate its critical positioning, Sayer proposes a revival of the concept of moral economy by turning questions of economic behaviour into normative questions of validity. This means broadening analysis out from questions about how economic systems work, to questions about what they are for. From Sayer's viewpoint, values are not beyond the scope of critical inquiry and debate. In raising questions about the normative context of economic activity, Sayer positions himself alongside other contemporary arguments about the need to reintegrate the economic with social phenomenon, and to recognize, challenge and develop the moral character of economies. Kiran Mirchandani and Evangelia Tastsoglou s article tackles the concept of ''tolerance,'' its place in the construction of Canadian identity and multiculturalism, and in the continuation of a racist, homophobic status quo. Their analysis uses the reporting of "tolerance" regarding "minority groups" in Canadian news media to show the strong link between the celebration of tolerance and the acceptance of inequality and oppression. This tolerance is central to Canadian multiculturalism policies and the exclusionary construction of the Canadian "national self." Mirchandani and Tastsoglou note, however, that tolerance is constructed as limited, thus protecting the status quo. This minimalist approach to tolerance, and the policy of multiculturalism which frames it, is contrasted with integrative anti-racism. In arguing for a diversity beyond tolerance, the authors place as central the systemic character of racism and the requirement of an action orientation. The authors conclude with detailed illustrations of the major contrasts between tolerance and integrative anti-racism. The articles by Katherine Teghtsoonian and Jacinthe Michaud engage with the gendered dimensions of policy development at
社论指出
挑战现状本期的文章都有一个共同的特点:挑战现状。在安德鲁•塞耶的案例中,政治经济学本身的现状受到了挑战。他认为,激进的政治经济学越来越多地反映了经济理性在多大程度上主导了生活世界。为了恢复其批判定位,塞耶提出了道德经济概念的复兴,将经济行为问题转变为有效性的规范性问题。这意味着将分析范围从经济体系如何运作的问题扩大到它们的作用。从塞耶的观点来看,价值观并不超出批判性探究和辩论的范围。在提出有关经济活动的规范背景的问题时,塞耶将自己与其他关于需要将经济与社会现象重新整合,以及认识、挑战和发展经济的道德品质的当代论点放在一起。Kiran Mirchandani和Evangelia Tastsoglou的文章探讨了“宽容”的概念,它在加拿大身份认同和多元文化建构中的地位,以及在种族主义和恐同现状的延续中。他们的分析使用了加拿大新闻媒体对“少数群体”的“宽容”报道,以显示宽容与接受不平等和压迫之间的紧密联系。这种宽容是加拿大多元文化政策的核心,也是加拿大“民族自我”的排他性建构。然而,Mirchandani和Tastsoglou指出,容忍被构建为有限的,从而保护了现状。这种极简主义的容忍方法,以及构成这种容忍的多元文化主义政策,与综合反种族主义形成鲜明对比。在主张超越宽容的多样性时,作者将种族主义的系统特征和行动导向的要求放在中心位置。作者最后详细说明了宽容和综合反种族主义之间的主要对比。Katherine Teghtsoonian和jacins Michaud的文章探讨了政策制定的性别维度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信