An evaluation of the driving and restraining factors affecting the implementation of hospital accreditation standards: A force field analysis

IF 1.4 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Mohammed Hussein, M. Pavlova, W. Groot
{"title":"An evaluation of the driving and restraining factors affecting the implementation of hospital accreditation standards: A force field analysis","authors":"Mohammed Hussein, M. Pavlova, W. Groot","doi":"10.1080/20479700.2022.2084810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background: Integrating accreditation standards in healthcare business operations is context-sensitive and affected by diverse factors. This study explored the driving and restraining factors influencing the implementation of accreditation standards in Saudi Arabian hospitals. Methods: A qualitative design using semi-structured in-depth interviews was employed. Twenty-seven hospital directors and 29 hospital quality directors were interviewed. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed. A force-field analysis framework was adopted to present a visual picture of the various factors influencing the implementation of hospital accreditation standards. Results: The analysis yielded 42 driving and restraining factors affecting the implementation of accreditation standards. The main drivers identified were teamwork, the quality mindset of leaders and staff, employing a continuous readiness model, and commitment toward customers. By contrast, insufficient manpower, infrastructural gaps, workforce recruitment challenges, variability among surveyors, the COVID-19 pandemic, limited financial support, and bureaucratic decision-making procedures were the main reported restrainers. At the national level, perceived restrainers pose a serious challenge to compliance with the existing accreditation model. Conclusion: Exploring the factors affecting accreditation standards implementation assists in assessing accreditation readiness, helps to prioritize efforts to strengthen drivers and weaken restrainers, and contributes to the institutionalization of accreditation standards.","PeriodicalId":46911,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Healthcare Management","volume":"16 1","pages":"167 - 175"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Healthcare Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2022.2084810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Integrating accreditation standards in healthcare business operations is context-sensitive and affected by diverse factors. This study explored the driving and restraining factors influencing the implementation of accreditation standards in Saudi Arabian hospitals. Methods: A qualitative design using semi-structured in-depth interviews was employed. Twenty-seven hospital directors and 29 hospital quality directors were interviewed. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed. A force-field analysis framework was adopted to present a visual picture of the various factors influencing the implementation of hospital accreditation standards. Results: The analysis yielded 42 driving and restraining factors affecting the implementation of accreditation standards. The main drivers identified were teamwork, the quality mindset of leaders and staff, employing a continuous readiness model, and commitment toward customers. By contrast, insufficient manpower, infrastructural gaps, workforce recruitment challenges, variability among surveyors, the COVID-19 pandemic, limited financial support, and bureaucratic decision-making procedures were the main reported restrainers. At the national level, perceived restrainers pose a serious challenge to compliance with the existing accreditation model. Conclusion: Exploring the factors affecting accreditation standards implementation assists in assessing accreditation readiness, helps to prioritize efforts to strengthen drivers and weaken restrainers, and contributes to the institutionalization of accreditation standards.
影响医院认证标准实施的驱动与制约因素评价:力场分析
背景:在医疗保健业务运营中整合认证标准具有情境敏感性,并受到多种因素的影响。本研究探讨了影响沙特阿拉伯医院实施认证标准的驱动因素和制约因素。方法:采用半结构化深度访谈的定性设计。对27名医院院长和29名医院质量主管进行了访谈。采访被记录下来,逐字抄录,并按主题进行分析。本研究采用力场分析架构,以直观呈现影响医院认可标准实施的各种因素。结果:分析得出42个影响认可标准实施的驱动和制约因素。确定的主要驱动因素是团队合作、领导和员工的质量心态、采用持续准备模式以及对客户的承诺。相比之下,人力不足、基础设施差距、劳动力招聘挑战、测量师之间的差异、COVID-19大流行、财政支持有限以及官僚决策程序是报告的主要制约因素。在国家一级,公认的制约因素对遵守现有认证模式构成严重挑战。结论:探索影响认可标准实施的因素有助于评估认可准备情况,有助于优先考虑加强驱动因素和削弱制约因素的努力,并有助于认可标准的制度化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
77
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信