Understanding the impact of a state‐wide reading consortium on literacy teacher educators

Joyce E. Many, Jennifer M. Green, Faith H. Wallace, M. Graham, B. Dixey, S. Miller, Cecilia Myrick, Beth Pendergraft
{"title":"Understanding the impact of a state‐wide reading consortium on literacy teacher educators","authors":"Joyce E. Many, Jennifer M. Green, Faith H. Wallace, M. Graham, B. Dixey, S. Miller, Cecilia Myrick, Beth Pendergraft","doi":"10.1080/19388070609558454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Research on the impact of professional development and mentoring in the activities of K‐12 classroom teachers and their positive effects has been widely documented (Borko, Davinroy, Bliem, & Cumbo, 2000; Broaddus & Bloodgood, 1999; Lyons, 1991; Richardson, 1999). However, comparatively little is known about the effect of professional development and mentoring on the lives of teacher educators. This study examines the impact of professional networks that include mentoring activities in higher education. Since the late 1990's, teacher educators from institutions across a southeastern state have participated in a state‐funded reading consortium designed to improve the literacy performance of P‐12 students. In an effort to better understand the impact of this network, this qualitative inquiry explored the development of this consortium and the impact of involvement in this state‐wide reading consortium on literacy teacher educators. Primary data sources focused on indepth interviews with members involved in the reading consortium for two or more years. Secondary data sources included (a) interviews with informants from various state agencies who had worked directly with the consortium, (b) course syllabi, and (c) consortium minutes, accountability documents and publicity documents. Constant comparative analysis of the data and follow up member checks revealed the nature of the collaborative network which emerged within this consortium and the ways in which this collaboration intensified over time and impacted both state initiatives and teacher educators. Specific positive impacts were apparent with respect to teacher education and professional development and with regard to the reshaping of literacy teacher‐educators professional lives as educators and researchers. Finally, the findings underscore the importance of support, through collegial and mentoring relationships as well as through state funding on professional development of the research and teaching lives of literacy teacher educators.","PeriodicalId":88664,"journal":{"name":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","volume":"45 1","pages":"319 - 352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388070609558454","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070609558454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Research on the impact of professional development and mentoring in the activities of K‐12 classroom teachers and their positive effects has been widely documented (Borko, Davinroy, Bliem, & Cumbo, 2000; Broaddus & Bloodgood, 1999; Lyons, 1991; Richardson, 1999). However, comparatively little is known about the effect of professional development and mentoring on the lives of teacher educators. This study examines the impact of professional networks that include mentoring activities in higher education. Since the late 1990's, teacher educators from institutions across a southeastern state have participated in a state‐funded reading consortium designed to improve the literacy performance of P‐12 students. In an effort to better understand the impact of this network, this qualitative inquiry explored the development of this consortium and the impact of involvement in this state‐wide reading consortium on literacy teacher educators. Primary data sources focused on indepth interviews with members involved in the reading consortium for two or more years. Secondary data sources included (a) interviews with informants from various state agencies who had worked directly with the consortium, (b) course syllabi, and (c) consortium minutes, accountability documents and publicity documents. Constant comparative analysis of the data and follow up member checks revealed the nature of the collaborative network which emerged within this consortium and the ways in which this collaboration intensified over time and impacted both state initiatives and teacher educators. Specific positive impacts were apparent with respect to teacher education and professional development and with regard to the reshaping of literacy teacher‐educators professional lives as educators and researchers. Finally, the findings underscore the importance of support, through collegial and mentoring relationships as well as through state funding on professional development of the research and teaching lives of literacy teacher educators.
了解全州阅读联盟对识字教师教育者的影响
关于专业发展和指导对中小学教师活动的影响及其积极影响的研究已经得到了广泛的记录(Borko, Davinroy, Bliem, & Cumbo, 2000;Broaddus & Bloodgood, 1999;里昂,1991;理查森,1999)。然而,专业发展和指导对教师教育工作者生活的影响却知之甚少。本研究考察了包括师徒活动在内的专业网络对高等教育的影响。自20世纪90年代末以来,美国东南部一个州的教育工作者参加了一个由州政府资助的阅读联盟,旨在提高P - 12学生的读写能力。为了更好地理解这个网络的影响,这次定性调查探讨了这个联盟的发展以及参与这个全州阅读联盟对扫盲教师教育者的影响。主要数据来源集中于对参与阅读联盟的成员进行两年或更长时间的深度访谈。次要数据来源包括(a)对与联盟直接合作的各个州机构的举报人的采访,(b)课程大纲,以及(c)联盟会议纪要,问责文件和宣传文件。持续的数据比较分析和后续的成员检查揭示了在这个联盟中出现的合作网络的性质,以及这种合作随着时间的推移而加强的方式,并影响了州倡议和教师教育工作者。具体的积极影响在教师教育和专业发展方面是明显的,在教师-教育工作者作为教育工作者和研究人员的职业生活的重塑方面也是明显的。最后,研究结果强调了支持的重要性,通过大学和师徒关系,以及通过国家资助扫盲教师教育工作者的研究和教学生活的专业发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信