Reflections on “Affect and digital caregiving: challenging the performing arts canon with a ’dig where you stand’ database”

IF 0.8 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
S. Breakell
{"title":"Reflections on “Affect and digital caregiving: challenging the performing arts canon with a ’dig where you stand’ database”","authors":"S. Breakell","doi":"10.1080/23257962.2022.2034608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This piece addresses the creative canon, of practitioners who are noticed and validated by the dominant discourses of the performing arts and their histories. In these discussions, the canon is enacted through the archive by means of practices such as collecting and documentation. Whose archives are taken into the collection and whose are excluded? Once in the archive, whose names — and therefore activities and legacy — are docu-mented as part of the cataloguing process, and whose remain invisible because they are undocumented by selective cataloguing practices and systems? By what institutional, professional or individual inequalities might some be privileged over others? If these are the risks of the archive, then a countering view, seen in this article, is that the archive is a source of data that can be used, through digital humanities work, to challenge and expand the canon. The article also touches on exhibition making as another manifestation and perpe-trator of the canon. In a museum context, the exhibition is a product of an institution and of individuals, who may have their own ‘master narrative’ and blindness. What is the museum’s position in relation to the diversity of its collecting or exhibition functions? the relation-ships between the institution, the collection, and practitioners of all may be a mechanism of the canon.","PeriodicalId":42972,"journal":{"name":"Archives and Records-The Journal of the Archives and Records Association","volume":"43 1","pages":"145 - 146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives and Records-The Journal of the Archives and Records Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2022.2034608","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This piece addresses the creative canon, of practitioners who are noticed and validated by the dominant discourses of the performing arts and their histories. In these discussions, the canon is enacted through the archive by means of practices such as collecting and documentation. Whose archives are taken into the collection and whose are excluded? Once in the archive, whose names — and therefore activities and legacy — are docu-mented as part of the cataloguing process, and whose remain invisible because they are undocumented by selective cataloguing practices and systems? By what institutional, professional or individual inequalities might some be privileged over others? If these are the risks of the archive, then a countering view, seen in this article, is that the archive is a source of data that can be used, through digital humanities work, to challenge and expand the canon. The article also touches on exhibition making as another manifestation and perpe-trator of the canon. In a museum context, the exhibition is a product of an institution and of individuals, who may have their own ‘master narrative’ and blindness. What is the museum’s position in relation to the diversity of its collecting or exhibition functions? the relation-ships between the institution, the collection, and practitioners of all may be a mechanism of the canon.
关于“情感和数字护理:用'挖掘你的立场'数据库挑战表演艺术经典”的思考
这篇文章讲述了那些被表演艺术及其历史的主导话语所注意和验证的实践者的创造性经典。在这些讨论中,正典是通过收集和记录等实践通过档案制定的。哪些人的档案被纳入收藏,哪些人的档案被排除在外?一旦进入档案,谁的名字——以及因此而来的活动和遗产——作为编目过程的一部分被记录下来,谁的名字因为被选择性的编目实践和系统记录下来而保持不可见?由于何种制度、职业或个人的不平等,一些人可能比其他人享有特权?如果这些是档案的风险,那么在本文中看到的一个相反的观点是,档案是一个可以通过数字人文工作来挑战和扩展经典的数据来源。展览制作作为经典的另一种表现形式和施暴者。在博物馆的背景下,展览是机构和个人的产物,他们可能有自己的“主叙事”和盲目性。博物馆在其收藏或展览功能的多样性中处于什么位置?机构、收藏和从业者之间的关系可能是一种规范机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信