Preservice and beginning teachers’ perceptions of the influence of high stakes tests on their literacy‐related instructional beliefs and decisions

C. White, E. Sturtevant, Kristy L. Dunlap
{"title":"Preservice and beginning teachers’ perceptions of the influence of high stakes tests on their literacy‐related instructional beliefs and decisions","authors":"C. White, E. Sturtevant, Kristy L. Dunlap","doi":"10.1080/19388070309558385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This longitudinal study examined preservice and beginning teachers’ perceptions of ways their literacy related instructional beliefs and decisions were affected by learning to teach in a high stakes testing environment. Data collection over a three‐year period included open‐ended survey responses from 64 teacher interns and individual interview responses from 8 former interns during the first and second years of teaching. Responses to the surveys and individual interviews were coded using themes that emerged from the data. Results of the study indicated that the preservice and beginning teachers varied in their perceptions of how high stakes tests influenced their literacy instruction. While many participants described strong influences of these tests on their instructional decisions, others reported only minimal effects. In addition, teachers frequently reported effects on their instructional decisions, but no effect on their instructional beliefs.","PeriodicalId":88664,"journal":{"name":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","volume":"42 1","pages":"39 - 62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388070309558385","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070309558385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

Abstract This longitudinal study examined preservice and beginning teachers’ perceptions of ways their literacy related instructional beliefs and decisions were affected by learning to teach in a high stakes testing environment. Data collection over a three‐year period included open‐ended survey responses from 64 teacher interns and individual interview responses from 8 former interns during the first and second years of teaching. Responses to the surveys and individual interviews were coded using themes that emerged from the data. Results of the study indicated that the preservice and beginning teachers varied in their perceptions of how high stakes tests influenced their literacy instruction. While many participants described strong influences of these tests on their instructional decisions, others reported only minimal effects. In addition, teachers frequently reported effects on their instructional decisions, but no effect on their instructional beliefs.
职前教师和初任教师对高风险考试对他们与识字相关的教学信念和决策的影响的看法
摘要本纵向研究考察了职前教师和初任教师对在高风险测试环境中学习教学对其与识字相关的教学信念和决策的影响方式的看法。在三年的时间里收集的数据包括64名教师实习生的开放式调查反馈和8名前实习生在第一年和第二年教学期间的个人访谈反馈。对调查和个人访谈的回应使用从数据中得出的主题进行编码。研究结果表明,职前教师和初级教师对高风险考试如何影响他们的识字教学的看法各不相同。虽然许多参与者描述了这些测试对他们的教学决策的强烈影响,但其他人报告的影响很小。此外,教师经常报告对其教学决策的影响,但对其教学信念没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信