Locobase Repair ® cream following CO 2 laser skin resurfacing reduces interstitial fluid oozing

J. T. Mortensen, P. Bjerring, Marie Cramers
{"title":"Locobase Repair ® cream following CO 2 laser skin resurfacing reduces interstitial fluid oozing","authors":"J. T. Mortensen, P. Bjerring, Marie Cramers","doi":"10.1080/147641701753414979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The cosmetic result after laser resurfacing depends not only on the type of laser and the technique used, but also on post-treatment care. The efficacy of Locobase Repair ® cream, which improves skin barrier function due to its content of natural skin analogue fats and cholesterol, was investigated. METHODS: A total of 18 Caucasian patients underwent resurfacing for acne scars. Laser treatment was performed with a Sharplan 1020 CO 2 laser and a Silk Touch scanner. Locobase Repair cream (a water-in-oil cream with 63% lipids including natural components of stratum corneum: cholesterol, ceramide and free fatty acids) was applied daily to one side of the face and petrolatum was applied to the other. In addition, both sides were treated with a 2% fusidic acid cream. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction of oozing during the first 2 days after CO 2 laser treatment on the sides treated with Locobase Repair cream ( p < 0.05), CO 2 laser while from day 3 to day 7 no differences were demonstrated between the Locobase Repair cream and petrolatum. For the other parameters scored (scaling, oedema, erythema and pain), no significant differences between Locobase Repair cream and petrolatum were found. Furthermore, no significant differences were found between the two creams regarding the duration of wound healing and final cosmetic outcome. In all, 62% of the patients preferred to use Locobase Repair cream during the postoperative period, and 11% preferred petrolatum. The remaining 27% expressed no preferences. CONCLUSION: The use of Locobase Repair cream as a post laser resurfacing treatment reduces tissue fluid oozing during the first 2 postoperative days, indicating a quick restoration of skin barrier and hence possibly a reduction in the incidence of wound infections as well as enhancing patient compliance due to less fluid oozing.","PeriodicalId":81650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cutaneous laser therapy","volume":"3 1","pages":"155 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/147641701753414979","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cutaneous laser therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/147641701753414979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cosmetic result after laser resurfacing depends not only on the type of laser and the technique used, but also on post-treatment care. The efficacy of Locobase Repair ® cream, which improves skin barrier function due to its content of natural skin analogue fats and cholesterol, was investigated. METHODS: A total of 18 Caucasian patients underwent resurfacing for acne scars. Laser treatment was performed with a Sharplan 1020 CO 2 laser and a Silk Touch scanner. Locobase Repair cream (a water-in-oil cream with 63% lipids including natural components of stratum corneum: cholesterol, ceramide and free fatty acids) was applied daily to one side of the face and petrolatum was applied to the other. In addition, both sides were treated with a 2% fusidic acid cream. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction of oozing during the first 2 days after CO 2 laser treatment on the sides treated with Locobase Repair cream ( p < 0.05), CO 2 laser while from day 3 to day 7 no differences were demonstrated between the Locobase Repair cream and petrolatum. For the other parameters scored (scaling, oedema, erythema and pain), no significant differences between Locobase Repair cream and petrolatum were found. Furthermore, no significant differences were found between the two creams regarding the duration of wound healing and final cosmetic outcome. In all, 62% of the patients preferred to use Locobase Repair cream during the postoperative period, and 11% preferred petrolatum. The remaining 27% expressed no preferences. CONCLUSION: The use of Locobase Repair cream as a post laser resurfacing treatment reduces tissue fluid oozing during the first 2 postoperative days, indicating a quick restoration of skin barrier and hence possibly a reduction in the incidence of wound infections as well as enhancing patient compliance due to less fluid oozing.
二氧化碳激光皮肤换肤后的Locobase Repair®霜可减少间质液渗出
背景:激光表面修复后的美容效果不仅取决于激光的类型和使用的技术,而且还取决于术后护理。Locobase Repair®乳霜的功效,由于其天然皮肤类似脂肪和胆固醇的含量,改善皮肤屏障功能,被调查。方法:共有18例白人患者接受了痤疮疤痕的表面修复。使用Sharplan 1020 co2激光器和Silk Touch扫描仪进行激光治疗。Locobase修护面霜(一种含油水的面霜,含有63%的脂质,包括角质层的天然成分:胆固醇、神经酰胺和游离脂肪酸)每天涂抹在脸的一侧,凡士林涂抹在另一侧。此外,双方均用2%夫西地酸乳膏治疗。结果:Locobase修复霜治疗后的前2天,Locobase修复霜与凡士林治疗后的第3天至第7天,Locobase修复霜与凡士林治疗后的第2天,渗液明显减少(p < 0.05)。对于评分的其他参数(结垢、水肿、红斑和疼痛),Locobase修复霜和凡士林之间没有发现显著差异。此外,两种面霜在伤口愈合时间和最终美容效果方面没有显著差异。总的来说,62%的患者在术后更喜欢使用Locobase修复霜,11%的患者更喜欢凡士林。剩下的27%表示没有偏好。结论:使用Locobase修复霜作为激光表面修复后的治疗减少了术后2天的组织液渗出,表明皮肤屏障的快速恢复,因此可能减少伤口感染的发生率,并提高患者的依从性,因为较少的液体渗出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信