Association Between Administrative and Ownership Characteristics of Hospices and Their Proportion of Inpatient Deaths

C. Ryan
{"title":"Association Between Administrative and Ownership Characteristics of Hospices and Their Proportion of Inpatient Deaths","authors":"C. Ryan","doi":"10.1080/0742-969X.2000.11882958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Hospice patients are more likely to die at home than patients involved in conventional medical care, but the proportion of home deaths varies between programs. A study of the effect of hospice administrative characteristics on inpatient death rates is presented. Data from hospice programs that operated in New York State between 1993 and 1995 were obtained from the State Health Department and from publications of the National Hospice Organization. Inpatient death rates varied significantly between different operating structures: 11% for hospices that were divisions of home health care agencies; 34% for hospices that were divisions of hospital corporations; and 20% for hospices that were independent hospice corporations. This difference was explained by the presence of dedicated inpatient hospice units: Programs with such units demonstrated higher inpatient death rates than those without (42% versus 11%; P < .00001). Though not necessarily causal, these associations should be of interest to patients, physicians, families, and policymakers. [Article copies available for a fee from The Haworth Document Delivery Service: 1-800-342-9678. E-mail address: getinfo@haworthpressinc.com ]","PeriodicalId":77421,"journal":{"name":"The Hospice journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"63 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0742-969X.2000.11882958","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hospice journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0742-969X.2000.11882958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Hospice patients are more likely to die at home than patients involved in conventional medical care, but the proportion of home deaths varies between programs. A study of the effect of hospice administrative characteristics on inpatient death rates is presented. Data from hospice programs that operated in New York State between 1993 and 1995 were obtained from the State Health Department and from publications of the National Hospice Organization. Inpatient death rates varied significantly between different operating structures: 11% for hospices that were divisions of home health care agencies; 34% for hospices that were divisions of hospital corporations; and 20% for hospices that were independent hospice corporations. This difference was explained by the presence of dedicated inpatient hospice units: Programs with such units demonstrated higher inpatient death rates than those without (42% versus 11%; P < .00001). Though not necessarily causal, these associations should be of interest to patients, physicians, families, and policymakers. [Article copies available for a fee from The Haworth Document Delivery Service: 1-800-342-9678. E-mail address: getinfo@haworthpressinc.com ]
安宁疗护院行政与所有权特征与住院病人死亡比例之关系
安宁疗护病人比接受传统医疗照护的病人更可能在家中死亡,但不同疗护方案的家庭死亡比例不同。本文研究安宁疗护行政特质对住院病人死亡率的影响。1993年至1995年间在纽约州开展的临终关怀项目的数据来自州卫生部和国家临终关怀组织的出版物。住院病人死亡率在不同的运营结构之间差异很大:作为家庭保健机构分支的临终关怀院为11%;医院公司下属的临终关怀医院占34%;20%是独立的临终关怀公司。这种差异可以用专门的住院安宁疗护单位的存在来解释:有这种单位的计划比没有的计划显示出更高的住院死亡率(42%比11%;p < .00001)。虽然不一定是因果关系,但这些关联应该引起患者、医生、家属和决策者的兴趣。[文章副本收费,可从霍沃斯文件递送服务:1-800-342-9678。电子邮件地址:getinfo@haworthpressinc.com
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信