Assessing Readiness for Death in Hospice Elders and Older Adults

L. Moody, Theresa M. Beckie, Charlene Long, Allison Edmonds, Stephanie Andrews
{"title":"Assessing Readiness for Death in Hospice Elders and Older Adults","authors":"L. Moody, Theresa M. Beckie, Charlene Long, Allison Edmonds, Stephanie Andrews","doi":"10.1080/0742-969X.2000.11882952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background: Readiness for death may affect the quality of the death experience and influence response to treatments. The psychologic vulnerability of the dying person is a major focus of palliative care. Accurate assessment of readiness for death may lead to earlier and more appropriate interventions. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the revised readiness for death instrument. Methods: Using a known groups technique and a cross-sectional study design, the revised instrument was administered to 52 elders in hospice care with a terminal diagnosis and 91 community dwelling adults without a terminal diagnosis. Results: Instrument content validity (Kappa = 0.96) was supported by three expert panelists who were hospice researchers. Principal components factor analysis explained 43% of the variance and partially supported the proposed four-factor structure of the revised 26-item instrument. Internal consistency was acceptable (.76). Discriminant validity was significant as assessed by an independent t-test between two contrast groups (t = 5.98, p = 0.000). The factor analysis, reliability testing, and qualitative analysis of items supported deletion of 2 items. Conclusions: Results indicated that the revised instrument has sound psychometric properties but further testing with a larger sample of hospice subjects is needed to confirm the factor structure of the instrument. [Article copies available for a fee from The Haworth Document Delivery Service: 1-800-342-9678. E-mail address: getinfo@haworthpressinc.com ]","PeriodicalId":77421,"journal":{"name":"The Hospice journal","volume":"77 1","pages":"49 - 65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0742-969X.2000.11882952","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hospice journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0742-969X.2000.11882952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Readiness for death may affect the quality of the death experience and influence response to treatments. The psychologic vulnerability of the dying person is a major focus of palliative care. Accurate assessment of readiness for death may lead to earlier and more appropriate interventions. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the revised readiness for death instrument. Methods: Using a known groups technique and a cross-sectional study design, the revised instrument was administered to 52 elders in hospice care with a terminal diagnosis and 91 community dwelling adults without a terminal diagnosis. Results: Instrument content validity (Kappa = 0.96) was supported by three expert panelists who were hospice researchers. Principal components factor analysis explained 43% of the variance and partially supported the proposed four-factor structure of the revised 26-item instrument. Internal consistency was acceptable (.76). Discriminant validity was significant as assessed by an independent t-test between two contrast groups (t = 5.98, p = 0.000). The factor analysis, reliability testing, and qualitative analysis of items supported deletion of 2 items. Conclusions: Results indicated that the revised instrument has sound psychometric properties but further testing with a larger sample of hospice subjects is needed to confirm the factor structure of the instrument. [Article copies available for a fee from The Haworth Document Delivery Service: 1-800-342-9678. E-mail address: getinfo@haworthpressinc.com ]
评估安宁疗护长者及长者对死亡的准备程度
背景:死亡准备可能影响死亡体验的质量和对治疗的反应。临终者的心理脆弱性是姑息治疗的一个主要焦点。对死亡准备程度的准确评估可能导致更早和更适当的干预。目的:本研究的目的是评估修订后的死亡准备程度量表的心理测量特性。方法:采用已知的群体技术和横断面研究设计,对52名临终关怀老人和91名非临终诊断的社区居住成年人进行了改进的工具。结果:量表内容效度(Kappa = 0.96)得到三位安宁疗护研究专家小组成员的支持。主成分因子分析解释了43%的方差,并部分支持修订后的26项工具的拟议四因素结构。内部一致性可接受(0.76)。经独立t检验,两组间判别效度显著(t = 5.98, p = 0.000)。因子分析、信度检验、质性分析均支持删除2项。结论:修订后的量表具有良好的心理测量特性,但需要进一步以更大样本的安宁疗护被试来确认量表的因素结构。[文章副本收费,可从霍沃斯文件递送服务:1-800-342-9678。电子邮件地址:getinfo@haworthpressinc.com
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信