Email: An Appraisal Approach

Q3 Social Sciences
Daniel W. Noonan
{"title":"Email: An Appraisal Approach","authors":"Daniel W. Noonan","doi":"10.1080/15332748.2018.1445607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For nearly a half-century, we in the archives, records, and information management professions have either taught our institutions and organizations, or been taught, that a record is a record, no matter the media or manner in which it is created. It is the informational value contained within the item that determines whether it is a record. If it is a record, we then need to identify the temporal value of that information to determine its lifecycle, that is how long it should be maintained and its final disposition, either destruction or accessioning to an archive. However, there still is significant pushback from our institutions’ desires to treat electronic or born digital records as something different from those that are paper-based and/or analog-born, and subsequently want to monolithically manage electronic/digital records’ lifecycles as a single record type. Fueled by the proliferation of desktop computing and subsequent loss of administrative assistants and in-the-trenches records professionals, consistent and effective records management processes have, to a significant extent, been lost in many organizations. This is exacerbated by low-cost and/or Internet cloud-based storage that creates the perception that we can keep all of our electronic/digital data, documents, records and information, and therefore lifecyclemanagement is not required. Alternatively, an organization may be in the opposite situation, in which the information technology infrastructure group begins to run out of space and wants to summarily delete the oldest things in the system. Neither situation is a sound data, documents, records, and information management strategy, nor does it address the potential archival value, or lack thereof, of the items. This problem exists throughout our organizations from our enterprise systems that manage human resources and financial data, to our shared drives, to the darkest and dankest quagmire of all, our email systems. Had Dante Alighieri been a records or informationmanagement professional in the twenty-first century, he may have assigned one level of his hell solely to email.","PeriodicalId":35382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archival Organization","volume":"13 1","pages":"146 - 151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15332748.2018.1445607","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archival Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15332748.2018.1445607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

For nearly a half-century, we in the archives, records, and information management professions have either taught our institutions and organizations, or been taught, that a record is a record, no matter the media or manner in which it is created. It is the informational value contained within the item that determines whether it is a record. If it is a record, we then need to identify the temporal value of that information to determine its lifecycle, that is how long it should be maintained and its final disposition, either destruction or accessioning to an archive. However, there still is significant pushback from our institutions’ desires to treat electronic or born digital records as something different from those that are paper-based and/or analog-born, and subsequently want to monolithically manage electronic/digital records’ lifecycles as a single record type. Fueled by the proliferation of desktop computing and subsequent loss of administrative assistants and in-the-trenches records professionals, consistent and effective records management processes have, to a significant extent, been lost in many organizations. This is exacerbated by low-cost and/or Internet cloud-based storage that creates the perception that we can keep all of our electronic/digital data, documents, records and information, and therefore lifecyclemanagement is not required. Alternatively, an organization may be in the opposite situation, in which the information technology infrastructure group begins to run out of space and wants to summarily delete the oldest things in the system. Neither situation is a sound data, documents, records, and information management strategy, nor does it address the potential archival value, or lack thereof, of the items. This problem exists throughout our organizations from our enterprise systems that manage human resources and financial data, to our shared drives, to the darkest and dankest quagmire of all, our email systems. Had Dante Alighieri been a records or informationmanagement professional in the twenty-first century, he may have assigned one level of his hell solely to email.
电子邮件:一种评估方法
近半个世纪以来,我们这些从事档案、记录和信息管理行业的人,要么告诉我们的机构和组织,要么被教导说,记录就是记录,不管它是通过什么媒介或方式创造出来的。项中包含的信息值决定了它是否是一条记录。如果它是一个记录,那么我们需要确定该信息的时间值,以确定它的生命周期,即它应该被维护多长时间,以及它的最终处置,是销毁还是加入到存档中。然而,我们的机构希望将电子或原生数字记录视为与纸质和/或模拟记录不同的东西,并随后希望将电子/数字记录的生命周期作为单一记录类型进行整体管理,这仍然存在重大阻力。由于桌面计算的普及以及随后行政助理和一线记录专业人员的流失,许多组织在很大程度上失去了一致和有效的记录管理流程。低成本和/或基于互联网的云存储加剧了这种情况,这种存储创造了一种观念,即我们可以保留所有的电子/数字数据、文件、记录和信息,因此不需要生命周期管理。或者,组织可能处于相反的情况,其中信息技术基础设施组开始耗尽空间,并希望总结地删除系统中最旧的内容。这两种情况都不是一个健全的数据、文件、记录和信息管理策略,也没有解决项目的潜在档案价值或缺乏档案价值。从管理人力资源和财务数据的企业系统,到我们的共享驱动器,再到最黑暗、最潮湿的电子邮件系统,这个问题在我们的组织中普遍存在。如果Dante Alighieri是21世纪的记录或信息管理专业人士,他可能会把他的地狱的一个级别单独分配给电子邮件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Archival Organization
Journal of Archival Organization Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: The Journal of Archival Organization is an international journal encompassing all aspects of the arrangement, description, and provision of access to all forms of archival materials. Articles on processing techniques and procedures, preparation of finding aids, and cataloging of archival and manuscript collections in accordance with MARC, AACR2, and other rules, standards, and cataloging conventions are only part of what you"ll find in this refereed/peer-reviewed publication. The journal places emphasis on emerging technologies, applications, and standards that range from Encoded Archival Description (EAD) and methods of organizing archival collections for access on the World Wide Web to issues connected with the digitization and display of archival materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信