A Pilot Study of Group Administered Metacognitive Training (MCT) for Schizophrenia Patients in a High-Security Forensic Setting: Subjective Training Success and Health-Related Quality of Life

Riitta Kuokkanen, K. Aho-Mustonen, Joona Muotka, R. Lappalainen, J. Tiihonen
{"title":"A Pilot Study of Group Administered Metacognitive Training (MCT) for Schizophrenia Patients in a High-Security Forensic Setting: Subjective Training Success and Health-Related Quality of Life","authors":"Riitta Kuokkanen, K. Aho-Mustonen, Joona Muotka, R. Lappalainen, J. Tiihonen","doi":"10.1080/15228932.2015.1053546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Metacognitive group training (MCT) for psychosis has showed promising effects on positive symptoms of schizophrenia, even in forensic settings. Its effect on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) or patient perspective of it has not been studied before in violent inpatients. This pilot study investigated the patient perspective of the MCT, assessed the intervention’s effects on HRQOL compared with the control group, and compared the patients’ HRQOL with that of the general population. Twenty male violent inpatients with schizophrenia participated and were randomized to the eight-session MCT or to treatment as usual. The participants’ HRQOL was assessed at baseline, at posttreatment, and 3 and 6 months later. Also, participants appraised the MCT immediately after treatment. The training satisfaction was high and compliance was good. On average, the patients’ HRQOL was significantly worse than in the general population and MCT did not have any effect on it, positive or adverse. Special efforts to improve patients’ HRQOL should be made.","PeriodicalId":89973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","volume":"15 1","pages":"344 - 362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15228932.2015.1053546","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2015.1053546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Metacognitive group training (MCT) for psychosis has showed promising effects on positive symptoms of schizophrenia, even in forensic settings. Its effect on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) or patient perspective of it has not been studied before in violent inpatients. This pilot study investigated the patient perspective of the MCT, assessed the intervention’s effects on HRQOL compared with the control group, and compared the patients’ HRQOL with that of the general population. Twenty male violent inpatients with schizophrenia participated and were randomized to the eight-session MCT or to treatment as usual. The participants’ HRQOL was assessed at baseline, at posttreatment, and 3 and 6 months later. Also, participants appraised the MCT immediately after treatment. The training satisfaction was high and compliance was good. On average, the patients’ HRQOL was significantly worse than in the general population and MCT did not have any effect on it, positive or adverse. Special efforts to improve patients’ HRQOL should be made.
高安全法医环境下精神分裂症患者群体元认知训练(MCT)的试点研究:主观训练成功与健康相关生活质量
精神疾病的元认知群体训练(MCT)对精神分裂症的阳性症状显示出有希望的效果,甚至在法医环境中也是如此。其对健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)的影响或患者对此的看法在暴力住院患者中尚未被研究过。本初步研究从患者角度考察MCT,与对照组比较干预对患者HRQOL的影响,并将患者HRQOL与普通人群进行比较。20名患有精神分裂症的男性暴力住院患者参与了这项研究,他们被随机分为8期MCT和常规治疗两组。在基线、治疗后、3个月和6个月后评估参与者的HRQOL。此外,参与者在治疗后立即对MCT进行评价。培训满意度高,依从性好。平均而言,患者的HRQOL明显差于一般人群,MCT对其没有任何影响,无论是积极的还是不利的。应特别努力提高患者的HRQOL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信