J. Harper, F. Schmidt, L. J. Cuttress, D. Mazmanian
{"title":"An Examination of Positive Impression Management Validity Scales in the Context of Parenting Capacity Assessments","authors":"J. Harper, F. Schmidt, L. J. Cuttress, D. Mazmanian","doi":"10.1080/15228932.2014.890482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although professionals conducting parenting capacity assessments (PCAs) frequently rely on test validity scales to measure parental efforts at social desirability, very limited data is available on their performance. The current study found strong concurrent validity between the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III) validity scales. Results were also consistent with previous studies that suggest parents engage in some level of impression management. However, the PAI appeared to identify far fewer parents as engaging in positive impression management when compared to the MCMI-III or what has been published in previous studies on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). Future directions and recommendations regarding the use of validity scales in PCAs are provided.","PeriodicalId":89973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","volume":"14 1","pages":"102 - 126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15228932.2014.890482","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2014.890482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Although professionals conducting parenting capacity assessments (PCAs) frequently rely on test validity scales to measure parental efforts at social desirability, very limited data is available on their performance. The current study found strong concurrent validity between the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III) validity scales. Results were also consistent with previous studies that suggest parents engage in some level of impression management. However, the PAI appeared to identify far fewer parents as engaging in positive impression management when compared to the MCMI-III or what has been published in previous studies on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). Future directions and recommendations regarding the use of validity scales in PCAs are provided.
虽然专业人士进行父母能力评估(PCAs)经常依赖于测试效度量表来衡量父母在社会期望方面的努力,但关于他们的表现的数据非常有限。本研究发现人格评估量表(PAI)与百万临床多轴量表- iii (MCMI-III)效度量表具有较强的并发效度。研究结果也与之前的研究一致,即父母参与了某种程度的印象管理。然而,与MCMI-III或之前在明尼苏达多相人格量表-2 (MMPI-2)中发表的研究相比,PAI似乎识别出从事积极印象管理的父母要少得多。并提出了未来在pca中使用效度量表的方向和建议。