Which related party transactions should be subject to ex ante review? Evidence from Germany

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q1 LAW
A. Engert, Tim Florstedt
{"title":"Which related party transactions should be subject to ex ante review? Evidence from Germany","authors":"A. Engert, Tim Florstedt","doi":"10.1080/14735970.2019.1667744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The amended EU Shareholder Rights Directive introduces a comprehensive regime of ex ante review for potentially conflicted transactions between listed companies and ‘related parties’ (major shareholders, managers, and others). If considered material, these transactions will have to be evaluated in advance by the board of directors, the shareholders' meeting, or the stock market. The most important choice to be made by member states in implementing the directive concerns the definition of ‘materiality’. We use hand-collected data based on IAS 24 reporting of related party transactions to estimate the number of German companies affected by quantitative materiality thresholds based on accounting assets, sales, market capitalisation, and other financials. One important recommendation derived from the analysis is to use more than one single quantitative test to define material related party transactions.","PeriodicalId":44517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","volume":"20 1","pages":"263 - 290"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14735970.2019.1667744","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2019.1667744","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The amended EU Shareholder Rights Directive introduces a comprehensive regime of ex ante review for potentially conflicted transactions between listed companies and ‘related parties’ (major shareholders, managers, and others). If considered material, these transactions will have to be evaluated in advance by the board of directors, the shareholders' meeting, or the stock market. The most important choice to be made by member states in implementing the directive concerns the definition of ‘materiality’. We use hand-collected data based on IAS 24 reporting of related party transactions to estimate the number of German companies affected by quantitative materiality thresholds based on accounting assets, sales, market capitalisation, and other financials. One important recommendation derived from the analysis is to use more than one single quantitative test to define material related party transactions.
哪些关联交易需要事前审查?来自德国的证据
修订后的欧盟股东权利指令引入了一种全面的事前审查制度,用于上市公司和“关联方”(大股东、经理和其他人)之间潜在的冲突交易。如果这些交易被认为是重大交易,则必须事先经过董事会、股东大会或股票市场的评估。成员国在实施该指令时最重要的选择是关于“重要性”的定义。我们使用基于《国际会计准则第24号》(IAS 24)关联方交易报告的手工收集数据来估计受基于会计资产、销售额、市值和其他财务数据的量化重要性阈值影响的德国公司数量。从分析中得出的一个重要建议是使用多个定量测试来定义重大关联方交易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信