Distribution of family history of a disease as a function of mode of inheritance, genetic relative hazard, allele frequency and disease status of the proband, with application to female breast cancer.

J. Cui, J. Hopper
{"title":"Distribution of family history of a disease as a function of mode of inheritance, genetic relative hazard, allele frequency and disease status of the proband, with application to female breast cancer.","authors":"J. Cui, J. Hopper","doi":"10.1080/13595220152601800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND This paper aims to determine the family history distribution of a particular disease as a result of its specific genetic aetiology, defined by the mode of inheritance (dominant or recessive), allele frequency, and increased risk in carriers of the genetic risk (genetic relative hazard). Here, 'family history' is the number of affected first-degree relatives of a defined index person (termed the proband), who may be either affected or unaffected with the disease in question. METHODS We consider model parameters relevant for female breast cancer in Australia. Breast cancer affects one sex only, although the extension of the model to both sexes is straightforward. RESULTS Contour plots of the relationships between family history distribution and genetic parameters, for both dominant and recessive inheritance, are displayed for the proband being either affected or unaffected. CONCLUSIONS Under dominant inheritance and an allele frequency of 0.005 (as may be appropriate for mutations in the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2), the proportion of affected probands diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50 years and who have no family history is stable as the genetic relative hazard increases from 5 to 20, decreasing from 89% to 85%. The probability that a proband has a family history is higher when the proband is affected compared with when she is not. For allele frequency 0.005 and relative hazard 10, the ratio of the probability of i (i = 1, 2, 3 or more) affected relatives for an affected proband compared with an unaffected proband is 1.2, 2 and 4.5 respectively, under dominant inheritance. Under recessive inheritance with allele frequency 0.35 and relative hazard 3 (as may be the case for a common polymorphism in the CYP17 gene), the corresponding ratios are 1.1, 1.3 and 1.5, respectively.","PeriodicalId":80024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of epidemiology and biostatistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of epidemiology and biostatistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13595220152601800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

BACKGROUND This paper aims to determine the family history distribution of a particular disease as a result of its specific genetic aetiology, defined by the mode of inheritance (dominant or recessive), allele frequency, and increased risk in carriers of the genetic risk (genetic relative hazard). Here, 'family history' is the number of affected first-degree relatives of a defined index person (termed the proband), who may be either affected or unaffected with the disease in question. METHODS We consider model parameters relevant for female breast cancer in Australia. Breast cancer affects one sex only, although the extension of the model to both sexes is straightforward. RESULTS Contour plots of the relationships between family history distribution and genetic parameters, for both dominant and recessive inheritance, are displayed for the proband being either affected or unaffected. CONCLUSIONS Under dominant inheritance and an allele frequency of 0.005 (as may be appropriate for mutations in the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2), the proportion of affected probands diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50 years and who have no family history is stable as the genetic relative hazard increases from 5 to 20, decreasing from 89% to 85%. The probability that a proband has a family history is higher when the proband is affected compared with when she is not. For allele frequency 0.005 and relative hazard 10, the ratio of the probability of i (i = 1, 2, 3 or more) affected relatives for an affected proband compared with an unaffected proband is 1.2, 2 and 4.5 respectively, under dominant inheritance. Under recessive inheritance with allele frequency 0.35 and relative hazard 3 (as may be the case for a common polymorphism in the CYP17 gene), the corresponding ratios are 1.1, 1.3 and 1.5, respectively.
家族史分布与遗传方式、遗传相对危险度、等位基因频率和先证者疾病状况的关系及其在女性乳腺癌中的应用
背景:本文旨在确定一种特定疾病的家族史分布,这是由于其特定的遗传病因,由遗传模式(显性或隐性)、等位基因频率和遗传风险携带者的风险增加(遗传相对危险度)来定义。在这里,“家族史”是指一个确定的指标人(称为先证者)的一级亲属的患病人数,这些人可能患有或未患该疾病。方法我们考虑与澳大利亚女性乳腺癌相关的模型参数。乳腺癌只影响一种性别,尽管将该模型扩展到两性是很简单的。结果显示了受影响或未受影响先证者的显性遗传和隐性遗传的家族史分布与遗传参数的关系线图。结论在显性遗传和等位基因频率为0.005(可能适用于BRCA1和BRCA2基因突变)的情况下,50岁前诊断为乳腺癌且无家族史的受影响先显子比例稳定,遗传相对危险度从5%增加到20%,从89%下降到85%。先证者有家族史的可能性,当先证者受到影响时比没有受到影响时要高。当等位基因频率为0.005,相对危险度为10时,在显性遗传条件下,患病先证者与未患病先证者分别有i (i = 1,2,3或更多)个患病亲属的概率之比分别为1.2、2和4.5。在等位基因频率为0.35、相对危险度为3的隐性遗传情况下(如CYP17基因的常见多态性),相应的比值分别为1.1、1.3和1.5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信