Representing Workers on Arrangements for Occupational Safety and Health in a Global Industry: Dock-Workers Experiences in Two Countries

Q2 Social Sciences
E. Wadsworth, Syamantak Bhattacharya, D. Walters
{"title":"Representing Workers on Arrangements for Occupational Safety and Health in a Global Industry: Dock-Workers Experiences in Two Countries","authors":"E. Wadsworth, Syamantak Bhattacharya, D. Walters","doi":"10.1080/14774003.2015.11667819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Trade union support is a key pre-condition for effective autonomous worker representation and consultation on occupational safety and health. Using data from a recent study, this paper considers such support in container terminals in two countries with contrasting industrial, economic and labour relations’ profiles — Australia and India. Within globally determined corporate approaches, the study identified distinctly different models of participation and varied extent, reach and focus of external union support. Worker representation and participation arrangements were least well-developed and least effective where the role of organised labour was smallest — and where these arrangements were lacking, workers experiences of working conditions and occupational safety and health outcomes were poorer. The paper concludes that national labour relations and regulatory contexts were the main determinant of both the existence and quality of participatory arrangements and that, without conducive contextual influences, terminal operating companies had little place for such arrangements in their corporate occupational safety and health management strategies.","PeriodicalId":43946,"journal":{"name":"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14774003.2015.11667819","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14774003.2015.11667819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Abstract Trade union support is a key pre-condition for effective autonomous worker representation and consultation on occupational safety and health. Using data from a recent study, this paper considers such support in container terminals in two countries with contrasting industrial, economic and labour relations’ profiles — Australia and India. Within globally determined corporate approaches, the study identified distinctly different models of participation and varied extent, reach and focus of external union support. Worker representation and participation arrangements were least well-developed and least effective where the role of organised labour was smallest — and where these arrangements were lacking, workers experiences of working conditions and occupational safety and health outcomes were poorer. The paper concludes that national labour relations and regulatory contexts were the main determinant of both the existence and quality of participatory arrangements and that, without conducive contextual influences, terminal operating companies had little place for such arrangements in their corporate occupational safety and health management strategies.
代表工人讨论全球工业中的职业安全和健康安排:两个国家码头工人的经验
摘要工会的支持是有效的自主工人代表和职业安全与健康协商的关键前提条件。利用最近一项研究的数据,本文考虑了澳大利亚和印度两个国家的集装箱码头的这种支持,这些国家的工业、经济和劳资关系概况截然不同。在全球确定的企业方法中,该研究确定了明显不同的参与模式以及外部工会支持的不同程度、范围和重点。在有组织劳工的作用最小的地方,工人代表和参与安排最不完善、最不有效,而在没有这些安排的地方,工人对工作条件和职业安全和健康结果的体验也较差。该论文的结论是,国家劳动关系和监管环境是参与性安排的存在和质量的主要决定因素,如果没有有利的环境影响,码头运营公司在其企业职业安全和健康管理战略中几乎没有这种安排的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Policy and Practice in Health and Safety
Policy and Practice in Health and Safety PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信