A reflection on the current local authority-led regulation model: views from small- and medium-sized businesses

Q2 Social Sciences
L. Borley, A. Page
{"title":"A reflection on the current local authority-led regulation model: views from small- and medium-sized businesses","authors":"L. Borley, A. Page","doi":"10.1080/14773996.2016.1255442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Health and safety regulation has been identified by the UK government as an area of over-regulation; a burden to business; and hindering economic growth. In response, recommendations have been made to government to reduce this regulation. While this seems to be the view held by government, many sources indicate that health and safety regulation has a role to play in supporting business and that ‘good regulation’ can actually help businesses and aid in their growth and economic prosperity. Guidance issued by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) to Local Authorities has left Local Authority regulatory departments unable to undertake proactive inspections in medium- and low-risk workplaces, relying on intelligence to trigger reactive investigative visits. Such visits effectively only allow the prevention of future repetitions rather than preventing harm in the first place. At the same time, spending cuts have seen reductions of 28% to Local Authority funding that has forced a re-examination of how to deliver services including health and safety regulation. Method: An empirical qualitative methodology was applied to test the health and safety compliance advice required by SMEs. Semistructured interviews (n-10) were carried out with selected SME owners/managers across a range of sectors with varying exposures to health and safety regulatory interventions, in the City of Peterborough. The interviews were conducted face-to-face at the business premises, recorded and transcribed. The data were coded in order to establish themes that were used to develop emergent theory. Results: Ten themes emerged from the data. One of the strongest themes that emerged was that businesses did not feel deregulation or reduced inspection would be beneficial either at the individual business level or across the sector. Of significant note was that participants wanted to continue to have inspections on a frequent basis. They felt that fewer inspections would lead to lower compliance levels and increased accidents. In addition, SMEs indicated that they do not have the skills or capacity to self-regulate and thus wish for tailored business advice to aid in protecting their workforce. Recommendations: The presumption, which regulatory visits are negative, is questioned by the research and indeed all interviewees welcomed the support that they gain from such visits. With this in mind, it is suggested that a more business advisory approach is adopted to meet SME needs and aid growth while still protecting the workforce. A number of recommendations are made including a risk-based proactive intervention strategy based on responsive regulation principles, improvement of communication and business engagement and focus on advice provision for SMEs. The recommendations are designed to meet businesses needs and also to contribute to business growth.","PeriodicalId":43946,"journal":{"name":"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety","volume":"14 1","pages":"144 - 162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14773996.2016.1255442","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14773996.2016.1255442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: Health and safety regulation has been identified by the UK government as an area of over-regulation; a burden to business; and hindering economic growth. In response, recommendations have been made to government to reduce this regulation. While this seems to be the view held by government, many sources indicate that health and safety regulation has a role to play in supporting business and that ‘good regulation’ can actually help businesses and aid in their growth and economic prosperity. Guidance issued by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) to Local Authorities has left Local Authority regulatory departments unable to undertake proactive inspections in medium- and low-risk workplaces, relying on intelligence to trigger reactive investigative visits. Such visits effectively only allow the prevention of future repetitions rather than preventing harm in the first place. At the same time, spending cuts have seen reductions of 28% to Local Authority funding that has forced a re-examination of how to deliver services including health and safety regulation. Method: An empirical qualitative methodology was applied to test the health and safety compliance advice required by SMEs. Semistructured interviews (n-10) were carried out with selected SME owners/managers across a range of sectors with varying exposures to health and safety regulatory interventions, in the City of Peterborough. The interviews were conducted face-to-face at the business premises, recorded and transcribed. The data were coded in order to establish themes that were used to develop emergent theory. Results: Ten themes emerged from the data. One of the strongest themes that emerged was that businesses did not feel deregulation or reduced inspection would be beneficial either at the individual business level or across the sector. Of significant note was that participants wanted to continue to have inspections on a frequent basis. They felt that fewer inspections would lead to lower compliance levels and increased accidents. In addition, SMEs indicated that they do not have the skills or capacity to self-regulate and thus wish for tailored business advice to aid in protecting their workforce. Recommendations: The presumption, which regulatory visits are negative, is questioned by the research and indeed all interviewees welcomed the support that they gain from such visits. With this in mind, it is suggested that a more business advisory approach is adopted to meet SME needs and aid growth while still protecting the workforce. A number of recommendations are made including a risk-based proactive intervention strategy based on responsive regulation principles, improvement of communication and business engagement and focus on advice provision for SMEs. The recommendations are designed to meet businesses needs and also to contribute to business growth.
对当前地方政府主导的监管模式的反思:来自中小企业的观点
摘要背景:健康和安全监管已被英国政府确定为过度监管的领域;累赘:对生意的负担;阻碍了经济增长。作为回应,已经向政府提出了减少这一规定的建议。虽然这似乎是政府的观点,但许多消息来源表明,健康和安全监管在支持企业方面发挥着作用,“良好的监管”实际上可以帮助企业,帮助它们的增长和经济繁荣。健康与安全执行局(HSE)向地方当局发布的指导意见,使地方当局的监管部门无法对中、低风险工作场所进行主动检查,只能依靠情报触发被动调查访问。这样的探视实际上只能防止今后的重复,而不是从一开始就防止伤害。与此同时,开支削减导致地方政府资金减少了28%,这迫使政府重新审视如何提供包括健康和安全监管在内的服务。方法:采用实证定性方法对中小企业健康安全合规咨询进行检验。在彼得伯勒市,对受健康和安全监管干预措施影响程度不同的一系列部门的选定中小企业所有者/管理人员进行了半结构化访谈(n-10)。面谈在营业场所面对面进行,并有录音和文字记录。对数据进行编码是为了建立用于发展涌现理论的主题。结果:从数据中得出十个主题。出现的最强烈的主题之一是,企业不认为放松管制或减少检查将有利于个人业务层面或整个行业。值得注意的是,与会者希望继续经常进行视察。他们认为,减少检查将导致更低的合规水平和更多的事故。此外,中小企业表示,它们不具备自我监管的技能或能力,因此希望获得量身定制的商业建议,以帮助保护其员工。建议:监管访问是负面的假设受到了研究的质疑,事实上,所有受访者都欢迎他们从此类访问中获得的支持。考虑到这一点,建议采取更多的商业咨询方法来满足中小企业的需求,并在保护劳动力的同时帮助增长。报告提出了一系列建议,包括基于响应性监管原则的基于风险的主动干预策略、改善沟通和商业参与以及专注于为中小企业提供咨询。这些建议旨在满足业务需求并促进业务增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Policy and Practice in Health and Safety
Policy and Practice in Health and Safety PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信