Interdisciplinary research for occupational safety and health knowledge

Q2 Social Sciences
S. Pink, P. Waterson, A. Dainty, A. Cheyne, R. Haslam, A. Gibb, J. Morgan, R. Hartley, A. Finneran, P. Bust
{"title":"Interdisciplinary research for occupational safety and health knowledge","authors":"S. Pink, P. Waterson, A. Dainty, A. Cheyne, R. Haslam, A. Gibb, J. Morgan, R. Hartley, A. Finneran, P. Bust","doi":"10.1080/14773996.2016.1235832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article, we argue for an interdisciplinary and pluralistic account of how occupational safety and health (OSH) is enacted in practice, informed by a critical understanding of OSH management and flow knowledge in organizations. We compare how in human factors and ergonomics, organization studies, and safety science this question is approached through different theoretical ‘lenses’, and with different analytical consequences. These approaches work with different concepts (systems, practices and behaviours) that situate human agency, and possibilities for practical intervention differently. To demonstrate this we draw on interdisciplinary research in to ‘Management of OSH in Networked Systems’, showing how mobilizing the concept of knowledge through different disciplinary frameworks can have implications for understanding safe working in networked organizations.","PeriodicalId":43946,"journal":{"name":"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety","volume":"14 1","pages":"22 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14773996.2016.1235832","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14773996.2016.1235832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract In this article, we argue for an interdisciplinary and pluralistic account of how occupational safety and health (OSH) is enacted in practice, informed by a critical understanding of OSH management and flow knowledge in organizations. We compare how in human factors and ergonomics, organization studies, and safety science this question is approached through different theoretical ‘lenses’, and with different analytical consequences. These approaches work with different concepts (systems, practices and behaviours) that situate human agency, and possibilities for practical intervention differently. To demonstrate this we draw on interdisciplinary research in to ‘Management of OSH in Networked Systems’, showing how mobilizing the concept of knowledge through different disciplinary frameworks can have implications for understanding safe working in networked organizations.
职业安全与健康知识的跨学科研究
摘要在本文中,我们通过对职业安全卫生管理和组织流动知识的批判性理解,论证了职业安全卫生(OSH)在实践中是如何制定的跨学科和多元化的解释。我们比较了在人因学、人体工程学、组织学和安全科学中,这个问题是如何通过不同的理论“透镜”来解决的,并产生了不同的分析结果。这些方法适用于不同的概念(系统、实践和行为),这些概念将人的能动性和实际干预的可能性置于不同的位置。为了证明这一点,我们借鉴了“网络系统中职业安全卫生管理”的跨学科研究,展示了如何通过不同的学科框架调动知识概念,从而对理解网络组织中的安全工作产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Policy and Practice in Health and Safety
Policy and Practice in Health and Safety PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信