Good Faith Duties in Contract Performance

Q3 Social Sciences
J. Paterson
{"title":"Good Faith Duties in Contract Performance","authors":"J. Paterson","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2015.1047655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT There has been an ongoing debate in common law countries about the merits of recognising a general obligation to act in good faith in the performance of contracts. Courts in England, Australia, Canada and Singapore have responded differently to this possibility. However, courts in those jurisdictions have been prepared to imply a similar bundle of more specific duties that are increasingly seen as expressing the core content of any general principle of good faith in contract law. The ‘good faith’ duties promote loyalty or fidelity to the contractual relationship, primarily by requiring honesty and cooperation in contract performance and by precluding the exercise of discretionary contractual powers in a manner that is unreasonable or outside the proper purposes of the power. The presence of these duties in the relatively stable and commercially orientated contract law of the jurisdictions considered suggests that ideas of good faith need not produce undue uncertainty for contracting parties. On the other hand, the increasingly well-established operation of these more specific duties raises the question of what would be gained through recognising a general obligation of good faith performance in the common law of contract.","PeriodicalId":35148,"journal":{"name":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","volume":"14 1","pages":"283 - 309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14729342.2015.1047655","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14729342.2015.1047655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

ABSTRACT There has been an ongoing debate in common law countries about the merits of recognising a general obligation to act in good faith in the performance of contracts. Courts in England, Australia, Canada and Singapore have responded differently to this possibility. However, courts in those jurisdictions have been prepared to imply a similar bundle of more specific duties that are increasingly seen as expressing the core content of any general principle of good faith in contract law. The ‘good faith’ duties promote loyalty or fidelity to the contractual relationship, primarily by requiring honesty and cooperation in contract performance and by precluding the exercise of discretionary contractual powers in a manner that is unreasonable or outside the proper purposes of the power. The presence of these duties in the relatively stable and commercially orientated contract law of the jurisdictions considered suggests that ideas of good faith need not produce undue uncertainty for contracting parties. On the other hand, the increasingly well-established operation of these more specific duties raises the question of what would be gained through recognising a general obligation of good faith performance in the common law of contract.
合同履行中的诚信义务
在英美法系国家,关于承认在履行合同中有诚信行为的一般义务的优点一直存在争论。英国、澳大利亚、加拿大和新加坡的法院对这种可能性的反应各不相同。然而,这些司法管辖区的法院已经准备暗示类似的一系列更具体的义务,这些义务越来越被视为表达了合同法中任何一般诚信原则的核心内容。“诚信”义务促进对合同关系的忠诚或忠诚,主要是通过要求诚实和合作履行合同,并通过排除以不合理或超出权力正当目的的方式行使自由裁量权。这些义务存在于所审议的司法管辖区相对稳定和以商业为导向的合同法中,这表明善意的概念不必给缔约各方带来不当的不确定性。另一方面,这些更具体的责任的运作日益完善,提出了一个问题,即通过在普通法合同中承认一般的诚信履行义务,将会获得什么好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信