Questions of gender: Ethnic minority representation in post-Mao China

Ralph A. Litzinger
{"title":"Questions of gender: Ethnic minority representation in post-Mao China","authors":"Ralph A. Litzinger","doi":"10.1080/14672715.2000.10419539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The burgeoning scholarship on ethnic minorities in the People's Republic of China has shown how minorities are often represented as feminized subjects in popular culture, film, museums, and tourist encounters. This scholarship has advanced a new critical understanding of the relationship between post-Mao nationalism and the display of minorities as objects of difference. This article builds on this scholarship by exploring how minority scholars have produced their own accounts of their people's cultures, histories, genders, and ethnicities throughout the post-Mao period. Specifically, it examines an essay written by the Yao scholar Liu Yulian in the early 1990s on the indigenous reproductive practices of the Chashan Yao subgroup, who live in the Jinxiu Yao Autonomous County in Guangxi. Her essay utilizes the theories of Marx and Engels on social reproduction to redress the ways in which the Chashan Yao had been classified, struggled against, and marginalized in Jinxiu County and it aims to promote a new interpretation of the Chashan contribution to China's socialist modernization agenda. Yet her work also raises a series of questions about how minority scholars were speaking for local communities and local realities. Rather than see Liu's writings as yet another example of China's practices of internal or “Oriental Orientalism,” this essay situates Liu's research in the context of local debates among minority scholars and other elite over who possessed the right to speak for and represent socialist modernity. And it suggests that new ethnographic and theoretical attention should be placed on how different actors perceive and understand the stakes of different styles and forms of ethnic and gender representation.","PeriodicalId":84339,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of concerned Asian scholars","volume":"17 1","pages":"14 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14672715.2000.10419539","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of concerned Asian scholars","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2000.10419539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Abstract The burgeoning scholarship on ethnic minorities in the People's Republic of China has shown how minorities are often represented as feminized subjects in popular culture, film, museums, and tourist encounters. This scholarship has advanced a new critical understanding of the relationship between post-Mao nationalism and the display of minorities as objects of difference. This article builds on this scholarship by exploring how minority scholars have produced their own accounts of their people's cultures, histories, genders, and ethnicities throughout the post-Mao period. Specifically, it examines an essay written by the Yao scholar Liu Yulian in the early 1990s on the indigenous reproductive practices of the Chashan Yao subgroup, who live in the Jinxiu Yao Autonomous County in Guangxi. Her essay utilizes the theories of Marx and Engels on social reproduction to redress the ways in which the Chashan Yao had been classified, struggled against, and marginalized in Jinxiu County and it aims to promote a new interpretation of the Chashan contribution to China's socialist modernization agenda. Yet her work also raises a series of questions about how minority scholars were speaking for local communities and local realities. Rather than see Liu's writings as yet another example of China's practices of internal or “Oriental Orientalism,” this essay situates Liu's research in the context of local debates among minority scholars and other elite over who possessed the right to speak for and represent socialist modernity. And it suggests that new ethnographic and theoretical attention should be placed on how different actors perceive and understand the stakes of different styles and forms of ethnic and gender representation.
性别问题:后毛时代中国的少数民族代表性
关于中华人民共和国少数民族的新兴学术研究表明,在流行文化、电影、博物馆和游客遭遇中,少数民族往往被描绘成女性化的主题。这项研究对后毛时代的民族主义和少数民族作为差异对象的表现之间的关系提出了新的批判性理解。本文以这些学术成果为基础,探讨少数民族学者如何在后毛时代对其民族的文化、历史、性别和种族做出自己的描述。具体来说,它考察了瑶族学者刘玉莲在20世纪90年代初撰写的一篇关于广西金秀瑶族自治县茶山瑶族土著生殖实践的文章。本文运用马克思、恩格斯关于社会再生产的理论,纠正了茶山瑶族在锦绣地区被分类、被对抗、被边缘化的方式,旨在对茶山瑶族对中国社会主义现代化进程的贡献进行新的解读。然而,她的工作也提出了一系列关于少数民族学者如何为当地社区和当地现实说话的问题。与其将刘的著作视为中国内部实践或“东方东方主义”的另一个例子,本文将刘的研究置于少数民族学者和其他精英之间关于谁有权为社会主义现代性发言和代表社会主义现代性的本地辩论的背景下。它还表明,新的民族志和理论关注应该放在不同的行动者如何感知和理解不同风格和形式的种族和性别代表的利害关系上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信