The 500-year Timorese Funu

Geoffrey C. Gunn
{"title":"The 500-year Timorese Funu","authors":"Geoffrey C. Gunn","doi":"10.1080/14672715.2000.10415774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As recent history reveals, the Timorese have not easily acquiesced to dominance by outsiders, now or in the past. This article sets down the broad contours of that past, investigates how that past has been reclaimed, and offers a reflection on the style of the Timorese resistance or war, loosely labeled funu in Timor's Tetum language. By setting down the boundary dividing colonial spheres of influence on Timor, the two concerned colonial powers, Holland and Portugal, unleashed a terrible hubris. This article argues that Timor under the Portuguese stood out in the Southeast Asian context, not so much in the level of violence used to neutralize rebellion, as in the longevity of rebellion, and even the inter-generational character of its rebellions down to modern times. From a Westernizing perspective, or at least a perspective that engages the colonial incorporation of Timor as a dependent tributary within a broader modern world-system, this article describes several discrete stages in Timorese history, albeit within a 500-year framework. But, it also asks, can the 500-year history thesis as defended by Wallerstein be sustained against the argument developed by Frank and Gills that much of the periphery was home to world-systems of its own long before the Columbian revolution, stretching back at least 5,000 years? Attempts to reclaim this history, this article shows, have been, and are bound to be, crucial to the making of an East Timorese identity.","PeriodicalId":84339,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of concerned Asian scholars","volume":"32 1","pages":"10 - 5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14672715.2000.10415774","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of concerned Asian scholars","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2000.10415774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract As recent history reveals, the Timorese have not easily acquiesced to dominance by outsiders, now or in the past. This article sets down the broad contours of that past, investigates how that past has been reclaimed, and offers a reflection on the style of the Timorese resistance or war, loosely labeled funu in Timor's Tetum language. By setting down the boundary dividing colonial spheres of influence on Timor, the two concerned colonial powers, Holland and Portugal, unleashed a terrible hubris. This article argues that Timor under the Portuguese stood out in the Southeast Asian context, not so much in the level of violence used to neutralize rebellion, as in the longevity of rebellion, and even the inter-generational character of its rebellions down to modern times. From a Westernizing perspective, or at least a perspective that engages the colonial incorporation of Timor as a dependent tributary within a broader modern world-system, this article describes several discrete stages in Timorese history, albeit within a 500-year framework. But, it also asks, can the 500-year history thesis as defended by Wallerstein be sustained against the argument developed by Frank and Gills that much of the periphery was home to world-systems of its own long before the Columbian revolution, stretching back at least 5,000 years? Attempts to reclaim this history, this article shows, have been, and are bound to be, crucial to the making of an East Timorese identity.
拥有500年历史的东帝汶富努族
最近的历史表明,东帝汶人现在或过去都不轻易默许外来者的统治。这篇文章勾勒出那段历史的大致轮廓,调查那段历史是如何被收回的,并反思东帝汶抵抗或战争的风格,在东帝汶的德顿语中被粗略地称为funu。两个有关的殖民国家,荷兰和葡萄牙,通过划定划分对帝汶的殖民势力范围的边界,释放了一种可怕的傲慢。这篇文章认为,葡萄牙统治下的东帝汶在东南亚的背景下脱颖而出,与其说是在镇压叛乱的暴力程度上,不如说是在叛乱的持续时间上,甚至是在其叛乱的代际特征上,直到现代。从西方化的角度来看,或者至少从将东帝汶作为一个独立的附属国纳入更广泛的现代世界体系的角度来看,本文描述了东帝汶历史上的几个独立阶段,尽管是在500年的框架内。但是,它也提出了一个问题,沃勒斯坦所捍卫的500年历史理论是否能够在弗兰克和吉尔斯提出的观点面前站得住呢?弗兰克和吉尔斯提出的观点认为,在哥伦比亚革命之前,至少可以追溯到5000年前,许多边缘国家就已经有了自己的世界体系。这篇文章表明,回顾这段历史的努力一直是,而且必然是形成东帝汶身份的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信