Ending the Evidentiary & Insurance Reimbursement Bias Against Neurofeedback to Treat ADHD: It Will Take Clinician Action in Addition to the Compelling Science

H. E. Pigott, Eugenia Bodenhamer-Davis, Richard E. Davis, H. Harbin
{"title":"Ending the Evidentiary & Insurance Reimbursement Bias Against Neurofeedback to Treat ADHD: It Will Take Clinician Action in Addition to the Compelling Science","authors":"H. E. Pigott, Eugenia Bodenhamer-Davis, Richard E. Davis, H. Harbin","doi":"10.1080/10874208.2013.785178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most frequently diagnosed pediatric behavioral health disorder with 11% of American school-aged children (and nearly 20% of high school boys) having been medically diagnosed with ADHD according to the latest report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Schwarz & Cohen, 2013), a significant increase from the 8% in prior reports (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2010). Stimulant medication and behavior therapy are the two most widely accepted treatments for ADHD, and these treatments are commonly reimbursed by healthcare insurers. Although both are considered to meet the highest standards for the ‘‘evidence-based treatment’’ of ADHD, and been recognized as such by the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP) and CHADD, the leading ADHD advocacy group, the actual evidence is that these treatments fail to result in sustained benefit for the vast majority of children who receive them as demonstrated in the NIMH-funded MTA Cooperative study, the gold standard study in ADHD treatment effectiveness research.","PeriodicalId":88271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotherapy","volume":"17 1","pages":"93-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10874208.2013.785178","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10874208.2013.785178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most frequently diagnosed pediatric behavioral health disorder with 11% of American school-aged children (and nearly 20% of high school boys) having been medically diagnosed with ADHD according to the latest report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Schwarz & Cohen, 2013), a significant increase from the 8% in prior reports (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2010). Stimulant medication and behavior therapy are the two most widely accepted treatments for ADHD, and these treatments are commonly reimbursed by healthcare insurers. Although both are considered to meet the highest standards for the ‘‘evidence-based treatment’’ of ADHD, and been recognized as such by the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP) and CHADD, the leading ADHD advocacy group, the actual evidence is that these treatments fail to result in sustained benefit for the vast majority of children who receive them as demonstrated in the NIMH-funded MTA Cooperative study, the gold standard study in ADHD treatment effectiveness research.
结束对神经反馈治疗ADHD的证据和保险报销偏见:除了令人信服的科学之外,还需要临床医生采取行动
注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)是最常见的儿科行为健康障碍,根据疾病控制和预防中心(Schwarz & Cohen, 2013)的最新报告,11%的美国学龄儿童(以及近20%的高中男孩)被医学诊断患有ADHD,比之前报告(疾病控制和预防中心,2010)的8%有显著增加。兴奋剂药物和行为疗法是治疗多动症最广泛接受的两种治疗方法,这些治疗通常由医疗保险公司报销。尽管这两种疗法都被认为符合多动症“循证治疗”的最高标准,并且得到了美国儿童与青少年精神病学学会(AACAP)和多动症倡导组织CHADD的认可,但实际的证据是,正如nimh资助的MTA合作研究(ADHD治疗有效性研究的黄金标准研究)所证明的那样,这些治疗方法并没有给绝大多数接受治疗的儿童带来持续的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信