Safety and efficacy of high fluence CO2 laser skin resurfacing with a single pass.

M. Khosh, W. Larrabee, B. Smoller
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of high fluence CO2 laser skin resurfacing with a single pass.","authors":"M. Khosh, W. Larrabee, B. Smoller","doi":"10.1080/14628839950517075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser skin resurfacing has nearly replaced more traditional methods of superficial skin rejuvenation. Post-treatment erythema is the most common side effect of this method of skin resurfacing. Sublethal thermal damage to the dermis has been proposed as an etiology for post laser erythema. Recent developments in laser resurfacing technology have aimed at minimizing thermal damage to the dermis. OBJECTIVE To determine depth of skin ablation, extent of thermal injury, and ideal laser parameters for the FeatherTouch laser system. To assess the safety and efficacy of laser resurfacing at high energy fluences with a single pass. DESIGN Laser resurfacing was performed in the preauricular skin of five patients undergoing rhytidectomy. A total of 60 sites were tested with fluences of 7 to 17 Joules/cm2. Histologic evaluation of excised skin showed maximal thermal injury to be restricted to 60 microns in the papillary dermis. The reticular dermis showed no evidence of injury. Based on these findings, laser resurfacing at 17 J/cm2 (70 watts) was performed on 30 patients (in the periorbital area, a maximum of 9 J/cm2 or 36 watts was used). Follow up ranged between 12 and 18 months. RESULTS Based on histologic comparison of average and high fluence laser resurfacing, high fluence laser resurfacing did not cause added thermal damage to the reticular dermis. In the clinical group, no major complications such as scarring, scleral show, infection or ectropion were encountered. Transient hyperpigmentation was noted in three patients. Overall patient satisfaction was good to excellent. Post-treatment erythema lasted an average of 4 weeks. CONCLUSION We conclude that CO2 laser resurfacing of the face (excluding the periorbital region) can be performed safely and effectively, with the FeatherTouch laser, at 17 J/cm2 with one pass. In our group of patients, laser resurfacing with a single pass at 17 J/cm2 caused less post-operative erythema than two or more passes at 9 J/cm2.","PeriodicalId":81650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cutaneous laser therapy","volume":"1 1 1","pages":"37-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14628839950517075","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cutaneous laser therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14628839950517075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

BACKGROUND Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser skin resurfacing has nearly replaced more traditional methods of superficial skin rejuvenation. Post-treatment erythema is the most common side effect of this method of skin resurfacing. Sublethal thermal damage to the dermis has been proposed as an etiology for post laser erythema. Recent developments in laser resurfacing technology have aimed at minimizing thermal damage to the dermis. OBJECTIVE To determine depth of skin ablation, extent of thermal injury, and ideal laser parameters for the FeatherTouch laser system. To assess the safety and efficacy of laser resurfacing at high energy fluences with a single pass. DESIGN Laser resurfacing was performed in the preauricular skin of five patients undergoing rhytidectomy. A total of 60 sites were tested with fluences of 7 to 17 Joules/cm2. Histologic evaluation of excised skin showed maximal thermal injury to be restricted to 60 microns in the papillary dermis. The reticular dermis showed no evidence of injury. Based on these findings, laser resurfacing at 17 J/cm2 (70 watts) was performed on 30 patients (in the periorbital area, a maximum of 9 J/cm2 or 36 watts was used). Follow up ranged between 12 and 18 months. RESULTS Based on histologic comparison of average and high fluence laser resurfacing, high fluence laser resurfacing did not cause added thermal damage to the reticular dermis. In the clinical group, no major complications such as scarring, scleral show, infection or ectropion were encountered. Transient hyperpigmentation was noted in three patients. Overall patient satisfaction was good to excellent. Post-treatment erythema lasted an average of 4 weeks. CONCLUSION We conclude that CO2 laser resurfacing of the face (excluding the periorbital region) can be performed safely and effectively, with the FeatherTouch laser, at 17 J/cm2 with one pass. In our group of patients, laser resurfacing with a single pass at 17 J/cm2 caused less post-operative erythema than two or more passes at 9 J/cm2.
高通量CO2激光单次换肤的安全性和有效性。
背景二氧化碳(CO2)激光皮肤再生几乎取代了更传统的浅层皮肤再生方法。治疗后红斑是这种皮肤换肤方法最常见的副作用。亚致死性热损伤的真皮已经提出了一个病因后激光红斑。激光表面修复技术的最新发展旨在最大限度地减少对真皮的热损伤。目的确定FeatherTouch激光系统的皮肤烧蚀深度、热损伤程度和理想激光参数。目的:评价单次高能量激光表面修复的安全性和有效性。我们对5例行除皱术的患者进行耳前皮肤激光表面修复。总共测试了60个地点,影响为7至17焦耳/平方厘米。切除皮肤的组织学评估显示,最大的热损伤限制在60微米的乳头状真皮。网状真皮未见损伤迹象。基于这些发现,对30例患者进行了17 J/cm2(70瓦)的激光表面置换(在眶周区域,最大使用9 J/cm2或36瓦)。随访时间为12至18个月。结果高通量激光表面修复与普通激光表面修复的组织学比较,高通量激光表面修复未对网状真皮造成额外的热损伤。临床组无结疤、巩膜露、感染、外翻等严重并发症。3例患者出现短暂性色素沉着。患者总体满意度为良好至极好。治疗后红斑持续时间平均为4周。结论采用羽触激光,以17 J/cm2的速度进行一次手术,可以安全有效地完成面部(不包括眶周区域)的CO2激光表面置换。在本组患者中,17 J/cm2的单次激光表面置换比9 J/cm2的两次或多次激光表面置换引起的术后红斑更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信