Hair reduction using a new intense pulsed light irradiator and a normal mode ruby laser

P. Bjerring, M. Cramers, H. Egekvist, K. Christiansen, A. Troilius
{"title":"Hair reduction using a new intense pulsed light irradiator and a normal mode ruby laser","authors":"P. Bjerring, M. Cramers, H. Egekvist, K. Christiansen, A. Troilius","doi":"10.1080/14628830050516470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE : The main purpose of this clinical study was to compare the effectiveness of an intense pulsed light irradiator system (IPL) and a normal mode ruby laser for hair removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS : Thirty-one patients were treated 3 times with a new IPL system on one side of the chin and neck and with a normal mode ruby laser on the other side. After 6 months, nine of the patients received 3 additional IPL treatments and 11 patients received 3 additional ruby laser treatments. All treatment intervals were 2 months. Hair reduction was measured by hair counts on close-up photographs. RESULTS : Hair reduction was obtained by 93.5% of the patients after 3 IPL treatments and by 54.8% after 3 ruby laser treatments. The average hair count was reduced by 49.3% after IPL treatments and by 21.3% after ruby laser treatments. Three additional IPL treatments following 3 IPL treatments resulted in only 6.6% further hair reduction - in total 55.9%, whereas 3 IPL treatments following 3 ruby laser treatments resulted in an additional 35.5% hair reduction - in total 56.8%. CONCLUSIONS : The IPL was found to be 3.94 times more effective than the ruby laser for hair removal. In the chin and neck region, more than 3 treatments with the IPL did not improve the therapeutic result significantly.","PeriodicalId":81650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cutaneous laser therapy","volume":"2 1","pages":"63 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14628830050516470","citationCount":"55","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cutaneous laser therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14628830050516470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 55

Abstract

OBJECTIVE : The main purpose of this clinical study was to compare the effectiveness of an intense pulsed light irradiator system (IPL) and a normal mode ruby laser for hair removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS : Thirty-one patients were treated 3 times with a new IPL system on one side of the chin and neck and with a normal mode ruby laser on the other side. After 6 months, nine of the patients received 3 additional IPL treatments and 11 patients received 3 additional ruby laser treatments. All treatment intervals were 2 months. Hair reduction was measured by hair counts on close-up photographs. RESULTS : Hair reduction was obtained by 93.5% of the patients after 3 IPL treatments and by 54.8% after 3 ruby laser treatments. The average hair count was reduced by 49.3% after IPL treatments and by 21.3% after ruby laser treatments. Three additional IPL treatments following 3 IPL treatments resulted in only 6.6% further hair reduction - in total 55.9%, whereas 3 IPL treatments following 3 ruby laser treatments resulted in an additional 35.5% hair reduction - in total 56.8%. CONCLUSIONS : The IPL was found to be 3.94 times more effective than the ruby laser for hair removal. In the chin and neck region, more than 3 treatments with the IPL did not improve the therapeutic result significantly.
使用一种新的强脉冲光照射器和正常模式红宝石激光器的毛发减少
目的:本临床研究的主要目的是比较强脉冲光照射系统(IPL)和正常模式红宝石激光脱毛的有效性。材料与方法:31例患者在一侧下巴和颈部使用新型IPL系统,另一侧使用正常模式红宝石激光进行3次治疗。6个月后,9例患者接受了3次额外的IPL治疗,11例患者接受了3次额外的红宝石激光治疗。所有治疗间隔均为2个月。头发减少是通过特写照片上的头发数来衡量的。结果:经3次IPL治疗后脱毛率为93.5%,经3次红宝石激光治疗后脱毛率为54.8%。IPL治疗后平均毛数减少49.3%,红宝石激光治疗后平均毛数减少21.3%。3次IPL治疗后3次额外的IPL治疗只导致6.6%的头发进一步减少-总共55.9%,而3次红宝石激光治疗后3次IPL治疗导致额外的35.5%的头发减少-总共56.8%。结论:IPL脱毛效果是红宝石激光脱毛效果的3.94倍。在颏颈区,IPL治疗3次以上均未明显改善治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信