Book Review: Unconscious Communication in Practice

J. Buckroyd
{"title":"Book Review: Unconscious Communication in Practice","authors":"J. Buckroyd","doi":"10.1080/135333300407648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"relationship that anger can be re-experienced as non-life-threatening. Although as therapists we have considerable psychological power in our patients’ inner worlds, largely due to the symbolically parental role referred to, and are likely to have more economic and social power than many of our patients/clients, it seems that this dimension is hard to take on board. Something in the rhetoric of equality seems to militate against the taking of legitimate authority by women working with women, a point that I. Bruna Seu comes at from a different angle when she points out: ‘Validating patient’s perceptions of inequality (particularly when it involves their therapists) is in no way antithetical to working with the unconscious and . . . a therapeutic intervention in itself ’ (p. 216). The chapters that succeeded best in holding my interest were those in which a clearly thought-out therapeutic framework is brought into dialectical relation with theories about women and power, and in which the transference, both positive and negative, is an integral part of the healing process. Both Pam Trevithick (‘Psychotherapy and working-class women’) and Aileen Alleyne (‘Which women? What feminism?’) – which deals with the experience of black women of African descent – are writing about women for whom gender is not the only, perhaps not the primary, source of oppression, and both treat skilfully the political as well as the psychological ramiŽcations of their work, cogently linking the external and the internal world. There is a very wide range of approaches to both feminism and psychotherapy in this collection, and the editors do a good job of marking out the Želd in their introduction, and then of looking back with the reader over what we have traversed together in their conclusion.","PeriodicalId":85362,"journal":{"name":"Psychodynamic counselling","volume":"6 1","pages":"266 - 270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/135333300407648","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychodynamic counselling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/135333300407648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

relationship that anger can be re-experienced as non-life-threatening. Although as therapists we have considerable psychological power in our patients’ inner worlds, largely due to the symbolically parental role referred to, and are likely to have more economic and social power than many of our patients/clients, it seems that this dimension is hard to take on board. Something in the rhetoric of equality seems to militate against the taking of legitimate authority by women working with women, a point that I. Bruna Seu comes at from a different angle when she points out: ‘Validating patient’s perceptions of inequality (particularly when it involves their therapists) is in no way antithetical to working with the unconscious and . . . a therapeutic intervention in itself ’ (p. 216). The chapters that succeeded best in holding my interest were those in which a clearly thought-out therapeutic framework is brought into dialectical relation with theories about women and power, and in which the transference, both positive and negative, is an integral part of the healing process. Both Pam Trevithick (‘Psychotherapy and working-class women’) and Aileen Alleyne (‘Which women? What feminism?’) – which deals with the experience of black women of African descent – are writing about women for whom gender is not the only, perhaps not the primary, source of oppression, and both treat skilfully the political as well as the psychological ramiŽcations of their work, cogently linking the external and the internal world. There is a very wide range of approaches to both feminism and psychotherapy in this collection, and the editors do a good job of marking out the Želd in their introduction, and then of looking back with the reader over what we have traversed together in their conclusion.
书评:实践中的无意识沟通
一种关系,愤怒可以被重新体验,而不会危及生命。虽然作为治疗师,我们在病人的内心世界中有相当大的心理力量,很大程度上是由于我们所提到的象征性的父母角色,并且可能比我们的许多病人/客户拥有更多的经济和社会权力,但这个维度似乎很难接受。在平等的修辞中,有些东西似乎阻碍了女性与女性一起工作时获得合法的权威,这一点I. Bruna Seu从不同的角度指出:“证实患者对不平等的看法(特别是当它涉及到他们的治疗师时)绝不是与无意识和……治疗干预本身”(第216页)。最能引起我兴趣的章节是那些将一个经过深思熟虑的治疗框架与关于女性和权力的理论引入辩证关系的章节,在这些章节中,移情,无论是积极的还是消极的,都是治疗过程中不可分割的一部分。帕姆·特里维西克(Pam Trevithick)(《心理治疗与工人阶级女性》)和艾琳·艾琳(Aileen Alleyne)(《哪些女性?“什么女权主义?”)——这是关于非洲裔黑人女性的经历——写的是性别不是唯一的,也许不是主要的压迫来源的女性,她们都巧妙地处理了她们作品的政治和心理分支,巧妙地将外部世界和内部世界联系起来。在这本文集中,涉及女权主义和心理治疗的方法非常广泛,编辑们在引言中很好地标出了主题,然后在结论中与读者一起回顾了我们所经历的一切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书