Student film collaboration: The east–west dilemma

Q2 Social Sciences
S. Kerrigan, Pieter Aquilia
{"title":"Student film collaboration: The east–west dilemma","authors":"S. Kerrigan, Pieter Aquilia","doi":"10.1080/13216597.2013.784209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper outlines the results of a study examining student collaborative practice in screen production courses in Singapore and Australia. Of particular interest, is how the Australian curriculum, originally designed for graduates of a Western liberal higher education system, would translate to a culturally diverse group of students in Asia. The study was informed by the hypothesis that students in Asia would adopt an Eastern collective collaborative style and students in Australia would adopt a Western individualistic collaborative style. The survey was based on a US film-making questionnaire, which used Bilby's Wheelbook, a tool for assessing screen production personality types. The survey results demonstrated strong similarities in the collaboration styles of the two cohorts, revealing that a majority of students from both Australia and Singapore display traits of individualism, but acknowledging the importance of collaborative skills. The similarities suggest that globalization has had a significant impact on film-making practices, and that future curriculum planning should more clearly articulate these collaborative practices helping students to manage deadlines, resolve conflicts and sustain team dynamics.","PeriodicalId":16118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Communication","volume":"19 1","pages":"147 - 166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13216597.2013.784209","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2013.784209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract This paper outlines the results of a study examining student collaborative practice in screen production courses in Singapore and Australia. Of particular interest, is how the Australian curriculum, originally designed for graduates of a Western liberal higher education system, would translate to a culturally diverse group of students in Asia. The study was informed by the hypothesis that students in Asia would adopt an Eastern collective collaborative style and students in Australia would adopt a Western individualistic collaborative style. The survey was based on a US film-making questionnaire, which used Bilby's Wheelbook, a tool for assessing screen production personality types. The survey results demonstrated strong similarities in the collaboration styles of the two cohorts, revealing that a majority of students from both Australia and Singapore display traits of individualism, but acknowledging the importance of collaborative skills. The similarities suggest that globalization has had a significant impact on film-making practices, and that future curriculum planning should more clearly articulate these collaborative practices helping students to manage deadlines, resolve conflicts and sustain team dynamics.
学生电影合作:东西方困境
摘要本文概述了一项研究的结果,该研究考察了新加坡和澳大利亚的学生在屏幕制作课程中的合作实践。特别令人感兴趣的是,澳大利亚的课程最初是为西方自由高等教育体系的毕业生设计的,如何将其转化为亚洲文化多样化的学生群体。这项研究的假设是,亚洲的学生将采用东方的集体合作风格,而澳大利亚的学生将采用西方的个人主义合作风格。这项调查基于一份美国电影制作问卷,使用了一种评估电影制作人性格类型的工具——毕尔比车轮书(Bilby’s Wheelbook)。调查结果显示,两组学生的合作风格非常相似,澳大利亚和新加坡的大多数学生都表现出个人主义的特征,但也承认合作技能的重要性。这些相似之处表明,全球化对电影制作实践产生了重大影响,未来的课程规划应该更清楚地阐明这些合作实践,帮助学生管理最后期限、解决冲突和维持团队活力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of International Communication
Journal of International Communication Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: International Communication is an established field of study taught widely around the world under a variety of names. Journal of International Communication (JIC) is a refereed journal the field of international communication calls its own and one that provides a forum for discussion for the various geo-academic approaches to the study of global communication. A variety of fields of study, including International Communication, International Relations, International Development, International Political Economy, Global Sociology, Media Anthropology, Media and Cultural Studies, and Post-colonial Studies nourish JIC .
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信