Edward V. Camp, K. Lorenzen, R. Ahrens, L. Barbieri, K. Leber
{"title":"Potentials and Limitations of Stock Enhancement in Marine Recreational Fisheries Systems: An Integrative Review of Florida's Red Drum Enhancement","authors":"Edward V. Camp, K. Lorenzen, R. Ahrens, L. Barbieri, K. Leber","doi":"10.1080/10641262.2013.838075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, an integrative review of the potential for stock enhancement is conducted to support desirable management outcomes in marine recreational fisheries, focusing on the Florida, USA, red drum fishery as a case study. Here, stock enhancement is implicitly seen as a way of simultaneously achieving both ecological objectives of sustained wild fish populations and socioeconomic objectives of high fishing effort and/or catch rates. However, the review suggests that a fundamental tradeoff remains between these objectives in the short-term because stocking of hatchery fish is likely to result in at least partial displacement of wild fish through biological interactions as well as increased fishing pressure. Contrary to the perception of enhancement as a “quick fix,” successful use of the approach in the marine recreational fishery is likely to require sophisticated stock management and some adaptation in governance. In developing the enhancement, it will be necessary to address uncertainty in key attributes, specifically dynamics of recruitment, angler-effort responses, and stakeholder involvement. This may be achieved by combining quantitative modeling, monitoring, and stocking experiments in an active adaptive management framework to consider enhancement in the context of alternative management strategies. It is suggested that any interim enhancement should minimize ecological risk per socioeconomic benefit by stocking larger fish in areas where high fishing mortality limits abundance of wild fish. These conclusions are largely generalizable to other recreational enhancements, and this work serves as a model of rarely published a priori enhancement evaluation.","PeriodicalId":49627,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Fisheries Science","volume":"21 1","pages":"388 - 402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10641262.2013.838075","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Fisheries Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641262.2013.838075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38
Abstract
In this study, an integrative review of the potential for stock enhancement is conducted to support desirable management outcomes in marine recreational fisheries, focusing on the Florida, USA, red drum fishery as a case study. Here, stock enhancement is implicitly seen as a way of simultaneously achieving both ecological objectives of sustained wild fish populations and socioeconomic objectives of high fishing effort and/or catch rates. However, the review suggests that a fundamental tradeoff remains between these objectives in the short-term because stocking of hatchery fish is likely to result in at least partial displacement of wild fish through biological interactions as well as increased fishing pressure. Contrary to the perception of enhancement as a “quick fix,” successful use of the approach in the marine recreational fishery is likely to require sophisticated stock management and some adaptation in governance. In developing the enhancement, it will be necessary to address uncertainty in key attributes, specifically dynamics of recruitment, angler-effort responses, and stakeholder involvement. This may be achieved by combining quantitative modeling, monitoring, and stocking experiments in an active adaptive management framework to consider enhancement in the context of alternative management strategies. It is suggested that any interim enhancement should minimize ecological risk per socioeconomic benefit by stocking larger fish in areas where high fishing mortality limits abundance of wild fish. These conclusions are largely generalizable to other recreational enhancements, and this work serves as a model of rarely published a priori enhancement evaluation.