Stock Definition and Recruitment: Implications for the U.S. Sea Scallop (Placopecten magellanicus) Fishery from 2003 to 2011

K. Stokesbury
{"title":"Stock Definition and Recruitment: Implications for the U.S. Sea Scallop (Placopecten magellanicus) Fishery from 2003 to 2011","authors":"K. Stokesbury","doi":"10.1080/10641262.2012.695816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United States sea scallop management plan applies fishing mortality in a uniform manner, assigning a single value of instantaneous fishing mortality (F) to the entire resource. Applying a single value of fishing mortality assumes the scallop resource is a single population. Dividing the resource into Georges Bank and Mid-Atlantic Bight reveals that each has been either excessively fished or underutilized based on the present definition of optimum yield. The sea scallop resource was highest in 2003 and has declined by about 50,000 metric tons, entirely from the Mid-Atlantic Bight. Abundance and the corresponding harvest levels will likely continue if the resource is a single population and scallops in the closed areas of Georges Bank populate the entire resource. Abundance and the corresponding harvest levels will likely decline if Georges Bank and the Mid-Atlantic Bight are separate populations in that scallops within these areas have a closed lifecycle. The depletion of the large number of small scallops in the Mid-Atlantic observed in 2003, and poor recruitment from 2009 to 2011, could lead to a rapid reduction in abundance, seriously impacting the fishery that was valued at US$455 million in 2010.","PeriodicalId":49627,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Fisheries Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10641262.2012.695816","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Fisheries Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641262.2012.695816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The United States sea scallop management plan applies fishing mortality in a uniform manner, assigning a single value of instantaneous fishing mortality (F) to the entire resource. Applying a single value of fishing mortality assumes the scallop resource is a single population. Dividing the resource into Georges Bank and Mid-Atlantic Bight reveals that each has been either excessively fished or underutilized based on the present definition of optimum yield. The sea scallop resource was highest in 2003 and has declined by about 50,000 metric tons, entirely from the Mid-Atlantic Bight. Abundance and the corresponding harvest levels will likely continue if the resource is a single population and scallops in the closed areas of Georges Bank populate the entire resource. Abundance and the corresponding harvest levels will likely decline if Georges Bank and the Mid-Atlantic Bight are separate populations in that scallops within these areas have a closed lifecycle. The depletion of the large number of small scallops in the Mid-Atlantic observed in 2003, and poor recruitment from 2009 to 2011, could lead to a rapid reduction in abundance, seriously impacting the fishery that was valued at US$455 million in 2010.
种群定义和招募:2003 - 2011年美国海扇贝渔业的启示
美国海扇贝管理计划以统一的方式应用捕捞死亡率,为整个资源分配单一的瞬时捕捞死亡率(F)值。应用单一捕捞死亡率值假设扇贝资源是单一种群。将资源划分为乔治浅滩和中大西洋湾表明,根据目前对最佳产量的定义,它们要么被过度捕捞,要么被利用不足。海扇贝资源在2003年是最高的,现在已经减少了大约5万吨,全部来自中大西洋湾。如果资源是单一种群,并且乔治滩封闭区域的扇贝占据了整个资源,那么丰度和相应的收获水平可能会继续保持。如果乔治海岸和中大西洋湾是分开的种群,那么扇贝的丰度和相应的收获水平可能会下降,因为这些地区的扇贝有一个封闭的生命周期。2003年大西洋中部观测到的大量小扇贝枯竭,以及2009年至2011年捕捞不力,可能导致丰度迅速减少,严重影响2010年价值4.55亿美元的渔业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews in Fisheries Science
Reviews in Fisheries Science 农林科学-渔业
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信