Fisheries Discards in the North Sea: Waste of Resources or a Necessary Evil?

Ben Diamond, B. Beukers-Stewart
{"title":"Fisheries Discards in the North Sea: Waste of Resources or a Necessary Evil?","authors":"Ben Diamond, B. Beukers-Stewart","doi":"10.1080/10641262.2011.585432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fisheries discards are often seen as a waste of resources and an impediment to the management of fish stocks. However, many traditional fisheries management measures have effectively encouraged discarding. This controversial dichotomy has recently prompted the European Commission to review its approach to managing discards, particularly in the North Sea, where discard rates are among the highest in the world. The European Commission jointly manages North Sea fisheries with Norway; however, in Norwegian waters, discarding is banned. To assess the effectiveness of this Norwegian policy, this study examined its effect on biologically isolated stocks of cod, haddock, saithe, and herring in the Northeast Arctic. Trends in stock status and economic performance showed that the Norwegian approach in the Northeast Arctic has been more successful than the joint approach in the North Sea. After considering the economics and current status of stocks, it is concluded that a discard ban throughout the North Sea for the above species could also offer substantial benefits. Implementation of this policy would be complicated by the more mixed nature (both politically and biologically) of North Sea fisheries, but the use of real-time area closures, gear modifications, and electronic monitoring systems could help ensure compliance and effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":49627,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Fisheries Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10641262.2011.585432","citationCount":"71","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Fisheries Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641262.2011.585432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 71

Abstract

Fisheries discards are often seen as a waste of resources and an impediment to the management of fish stocks. However, many traditional fisheries management measures have effectively encouraged discarding. This controversial dichotomy has recently prompted the European Commission to review its approach to managing discards, particularly in the North Sea, where discard rates are among the highest in the world. The European Commission jointly manages North Sea fisheries with Norway; however, in Norwegian waters, discarding is banned. To assess the effectiveness of this Norwegian policy, this study examined its effect on biologically isolated stocks of cod, haddock, saithe, and herring in the Northeast Arctic. Trends in stock status and economic performance showed that the Norwegian approach in the Northeast Arctic has been more successful than the joint approach in the North Sea. After considering the economics and current status of stocks, it is concluded that a discard ban throughout the North Sea for the above species could also offer substantial benefits. Implementation of this policy would be complicated by the more mixed nature (both politically and biologically) of North Sea fisheries, but the use of real-time area closures, gear modifications, and electronic monitoring systems could help ensure compliance and effectiveness.
北海渔业废弃物:资源浪费还是必然之恶?
渔业抛弃物往往被视为资源的浪费和对鱼类种群管理的障碍。然而,许多传统的渔业管理措施有效地鼓励了丢弃。这种有争议的二分法最近促使欧盟委员会重新审视其处理垃圾的方法,特别是在北海,那里的垃圾丢弃率是世界上最高的。欧盟委员会与挪威共同管理北海渔业;然而,在挪威水域,禁止丢弃垃圾。为了评估挪威这项政策的有效性,本研究考察了它对北极东北部生物隔离的鳕鱼、黑线鳕、赛义鱼和鲱鱼种群的影响。储量状况和经济表现的趋势表明,挪威在北极东北部的做法比在北海的联合做法更为成功。在考虑了经济和种群的现状后,得出的结论是,在整个北海禁止丢弃上述物种也可以带来实质性的好处。北海渔业的混合性质(政治上和生物上)会使这项政策的实施变得更加复杂,但使用实时区域关闭、设备修改和电子监控系统可以帮助确保合规和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews in Fisheries Science
Reviews in Fisheries Science 农林科学-渔业
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信