The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity

IF 10.1 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

European Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2015-01-01 DOI:10.1080/10463283.2015.1070018

Gordon Hodson, Kristof Dhont

引用次数: 178

Abstract

Person-based factors influence a range of meaningful life outcomes, including intergroup processes, and have long been implicated in explaining prejudice. In addition to demonstrating significant heritability, person-based factors are evident in expressions of generalised prejudice, a robust finding that some people (relative to others) consistently score higher in prejudice towards multiple outgroups. Our contemporary review includes personality factors, ideological orientations (e.g., authoritarianism), religiosity, anxiety, threat, disgust sensitivity, and cognitive abilities and styles. Meta-analytic syntheses demonstrate that such constructs consistently predict prejudice, often at the upper bounds of effect sizes observed in psychological research. We conclude that prejudice theories need to better integrate person- and situation-based factors, including their interaction, to capture the complexity of prejudice and inform intervention development.

查看原文本刊更多论文

偏见以人为本的本质:群体间消极性的个体差异预测因子

以人为本的因素影响着一系列有意义的生活结果，包括群体间的过程，并且长期以来一直与解释偏见有关。除了表现出显著的遗传性外，基于个人的因素在普遍偏见的表达中也很明显，这是一个强有力的发现，即一些人(相对于其他人)在对多个外群体的偏见中始终得分更高。我们的当代回顾包括人格因素、意识形态取向(如威权主义)、宗教信仰、焦虑、威胁、厌恶敏感性以及认知能力和风格。元分析综合表明，这些构念始终如一地预测偏见，通常在心理学研究中观察到的效应大小的上限。我们的结论是，偏见理论需要更好地整合基于个人和情境的因素，包括它们之间的相互作用，以捕捉偏见的复杂性，并为干预措施的发展提供信息。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Review of Social Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-

CiteScore

15.30

自引率

2.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： The "European Review of Social Psychology (ERSP)" is a distinguished international journal that operates under the patronage of the European Association of Social Psychology. It serves as a platform for comprehensive, theory-driven reviews that cover the broad spectrum of social psychology. The journal is open to submissions from authors worldwide and is guided by a prestigious international editorial board. ERSP is particularly interested in publishing reviews that reflect the author's own research program, as demonstrated by their publications in leading peer-reviewed journals. The journal values theoretical contributions that are grounded in a substantial empirical foundation, situating the research within the broader context of existing literature and offering a synthesis that goes beyond the individual articles. In addition to these in-depth reviews, ERSP also welcomes conventional reviews and meta-analyses, further enriching the journal's offerings. By focusing on high-quality, evidence-based research, ERSP contributes significantly to the advancement of knowledge in social psychology and fosters a deeper understanding of human social behavior across cultures and societies.