Marx on Ricardo: an explanation of some important misunderstandings

IF 0.6 3区经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS

European Journal of the History of Economic Thought Pub Date : 1998-06-01 DOI:10.1080/10427719800000021

E. Feess

引用次数: 2

Abstract

Ricardo's theory of value and distribution is reconstructed by proceeding along the lines of Marx's critique of Ricardo. It is thus an anti-critique of Marx's reading of Ricardo. The chapter 'On Value' in Ricardo's Principles is shown to be a consistent and rigorous treatment of the determinants of prices of production. According to Ricardo labor-values merely serve to approximate more elaborate standards of value. Marx's criticism is shown to rest crucially on his own misinterpretation of Ricardo's definitions and presupposes his own - faulty - theory of surplus value. Therefore Ricardo's theory can - contrary to Marx's theory of surplus value - still be regarded as a fruitful complement to Sraffa's model.

查看原文本刊更多论文

马克思论李嘉图:对一些重要误解的解释

李嘉图的价值与分配理论是沿着马克思对李嘉图的批判路线进行重构的。因此，这是对马克思解读李嘉图的一种反批判。李嘉图的《原理》中的“论价值”一章被证明是对生产价格决定因素的一致和严格的处理。李嘉图认为，劳动价值只是用来近似更复杂的价值标准。马克思的批评主要是基于他自己对李嘉图定义的误解，并预设了他自己的——有缺陷的——剩余价值理论。因此，李嘉图的理论——与马克思的剩余价值理论相反——仍然可以被视为对斯拉法模型的有益补充。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Journal of the History of Economic Thought Multiple-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

28.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought (EJHET), a peer-reviewed journal, has quickly established itself as a leading forum for lively discussion on a wide range of issues in the history of economic thought. With contributions from both established international scholars and younger academics, EJHET is entirely pluralist and non-partisan with regard to subjects and methodologies - it does not subscribe to any particular current of thought, nor relate to any one geographic zone. The Managing Editors and Editorial Board and Advisory Board members are drawn from throughout Europe and beyond, and are committed to encouraging scholars from around the world to contribute to international research and debate.