Abortion, reproductive rights and maternal mortality.

R. Pearson, C. Sweetman
{"title":"Abortion, reproductive rights and maternal mortality.","authors":"R. Pearson, C. Sweetman","doi":"10.1080/09682869308520011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Women prefer to prevent unwanted pregnancies. Women do not prefer abortion. Unsafe abortion kills and contributes to 40% of maternal mortality worldwide or an estimated 200,000 deaths/year. More than 50% of abortions are performed by unskilled persons. Legal abortion i 11 times safer than childbirth in the USA. About 7 out of 10 women would have an unwanted pregnancy, even if fertility were reduced to 2 births/woman. There are costs beyond death, pain, and suffering of the women themselves; costs are incurred by families and communities and health services. The costs of after care exceed the cost of performing an abortion. Women are frequently denied autonomy to prevent pregnancy. When contraception is denied, the only possible option for women to take control of their lives and destiny is abortion. Male-dominated cultures prescribe the role of woman as procreation and motherhood, without contraception or abortion options. The Roman Catholic encyclical \"Veritatis Splendor\" espouses such a belief. Women in fact share a multiplicity of roles. Socially sanctioned norms have never been able to control sexual relations, and development initiatives must address functional behavior, rather than idealized behavior. For example, Safe Motherhood programs integrate family planning in educational and health care services, but the emphasis is on contraception among high risk women, and unsafe abortion is ignored. Abortion has not only been viewed as an option for contraceptive failure, but as a means of fertility control. Communist bloc countries frequently provided no other option, except abortion. Poverty and social status were considered tied to access to contraceptive advice and appropriate, safe technology. Poor women may seek unsafe abortion as an inexpensive option; safe abortion even in illegal circumstances can be purchased for those able to afford it. Although rape and incest are socially unacceptable, many countries will not provide abortion even in these circumstances. State funding of abortion may have limits for provision of services only to those in severe mental or physical conditions. Son preference has contributed to the abuse of abortion. The abortion issue should be viewed as an issue of human rights and women's empowerment, and unsafe abortion must be addressed as part of health policy.\n","PeriodicalId":84761,"journal":{"name":"Focus on gender","volume":"2 2 1","pages":"45-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09682869308520011","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Focus on gender","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09682869308520011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Women prefer to prevent unwanted pregnancies. Women do not prefer abortion. Unsafe abortion kills and contributes to 40% of maternal mortality worldwide or an estimated 200,000 deaths/year. More than 50% of abortions are performed by unskilled persons. Legal abortion i 11 times safer than childbirth in the USA. About 7 out of 10 women would have an unwanted pregnancy, even if fertility were reduced to 2 births/woman. There are costs beyond death, pain, and suffering of the women themselves; costs are incurred by families and communities and health services. The costs of after care exceed the cost of performing an abortion. Women are frequently denied autonomy to prevent pregnancy. When contraception is denied, the only possible option for women to take control of their lives and destiny is abortion. Male-dominated cultures prescribe the role of woman as procreation and motherhood, without contraception or abortion options. The Roman Catholic encyclical "Veritatis Splendor" espouses such a belief. Women in fact share a multiplicity of roles. Socially sanctioned norms have never been able to control sexual relations, and development initiatives must address functional behavior, rather than idealized behavior. For example, Safe Motherhood programs integrate family planning in educational and health care services, but the emphasis is on contraception among high risk women, and unsafe abortion is ignored. Abortion has not only been viewed as an option for contraceptive failure, but as a means of fertility control. Communist bloc countries frequently provided no other option, except abortion. Poverty and social status were considered tied to access to contraceptive advice and appropriate, safe technology. Poor women may seek unsafe abortion as an inexpensive option; safe abortion even in illegal circumstances can be purchased for those able to afford it. Although rape and incest are socially unacceptable, many countries will not provide abortion even in these circumstances. State funding of abortion may have limits for provision of services only to those in severe mental or physical conditions. Son preference has contributed to the abuse of abortion. The abortion issue should be viewed as an issue of human rights and women's empowerment, and unsafe abortion must be addressed as part of health policy.
堕胎、生殖权利和孕产妇死亡率。
女性更喜欢防止意外怀孕。妇女不喜欢堕胎。不安全堕胎致死并造成全世界40%的孕产妇死亡,或每年约20万人死亡。超过50%的堕胎是由非技术人员实施的。在美国,合法堕胎比分娩安全11倍。即使生育率降低到每个妇女只生两个孩子,10个妇女中也有7个会意外怀孕。这些代价超出了妇女本身的死亡、痛苦和苦难;费用由家庭、社区和卫生服务部门承担。术后护理的费用超过了人工流产的费用。妇女经常被剥夺避孕的自主权。当避孕被拒绝时,女性控制自己生活和命运的唯一可能选择就是堕胎。男性主导的文化规定了妇女作为生育和母亲的角色,没有避孕或堕胎的选择。罗马天主教的通谕“Veritatis Splendor”支持这样的信念。事实上,妇女承担着多重角色。社会认可的规范从未能够控制性关系,发展倡议必须解决功能性行为,而不是理想化的行为。例如,安全孕产方案将计划生育纳入教育和保健服务,但重点放在高危妇女的避孕上,而忽视了不安全堕胎。堕胎不仅被视为避孕失败的一种选择,而且被视为控制生育的一种手段。除了堕胎,共产主义集团国家通常没有其他选择。贫穷和社会地位被认为与获得避孕建议和适当、安全的技术有关。贫穷妇女可能寻求不安全堕胎作为一种廉价的选择;即使在非法情况下,也可以为有能力的人购买安全堕胎。虽然强奸和乱伦在社会上是不可接受的,但许多国家即使在这种情况下也不提供堕胎。国家对堕胎的资助可能有限制,仅向精神或身体状况严重的人提供服务。重男轻女导致了堕胎的滥用。堕胎问题应被视为人权和赋予妇女权力的问题,不安全堕胎必须作为卫生政策的一部分加以处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信