Schumpeter on the integration of theory and history

IF 0.6 3区经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS

European Journal of the History of Economic Thought Pub Date : 2003-07-01 DOI:10.1080/0967256032000066909

Mário da Graça Moura

引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper assesses Joseph Schumpeter's agenda for the integration of theory and history. On the basis of a critical realist conception of the nature of historical theory it is argued that Schumpeter's aims are at odds with his analytical strategy: his implicit ontology cannot be reconciled with his conception of theory. An illustration is provided as to how this mismatch is reproduced in Schumpeter's substantive attempts to integrate theory and history, and brief reflections are offered as to why this mismatch arose and endured.

查看原文本刊更多论文

熊彼特关于理论与历史的整合

本文评估了约瑟夫·熊彼特的理论与历史的整合议程。在历史理论本质的批判现实主义概念的基础上，有人认为熊彼特的目标与他的分析策略不一致:他的隐含本体论与他的理论概念不能调和。熊彼特在整合理论和历史的实质性尝试中，这种不匹配是如何再现的，本文提供了一个例证，并简要反思了这种不匹配产生和持续的原因。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Journal of the History of Economic Thought Multiple-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

28.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought (EJHET), a peer-reviewed journal, has quickly established itself as a leading forum for lively discussion on a wide range of issues in the history of economic thought. With contributions from both established international scholars and younger academics, EJHET is entirely pluralist and non-partisan with regard to subjects and methodologies - it does not subscribe to any particular current of thought, nor relate to any one geographic zone. The Managing Editors and Editorial Board and Advisory Board members are drawn from throughout Europe and beyond, and are committed to encouraging scholars from around the world to contribute to international research and debate.