{"title":"Criticism of the paper titled ‘Solidification thermal parameters, microstructural evolution and dendritic growth in an AlCuNi alloy’ by Correa et al.","authors":"M. Tiryakioğlu, Güven Kurtuldu","doi":"10.1080/09500839.2021.1994160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, Correa et al. [1] conducted experiments on the relationship between solidification parameters, including solidification time ts and secondary dendrite arm spacing λ2, for an Al-3wt.%Cu-3wt.%Ni alloy. Their data for the ts λ2 relationship are presented in Figure 1. Note that there are two regions with very different slopes (i.e. the exponent of ts). The fit to the data by Correa et al. is presented in the figure. Note that the slope in the trend of the data, i.e. the exponent of solidification time, is 0.076 below ts = 70 s – a value significantly less than 1/3. At longer solidification times, the exponent of the solidification time is 0.251, a value approaching 1/3, which is consistent with coarsening. The reason for the existence of two distinct regions is unknown. Correa et al. applied the Rappaz-Boettinger [2] and Tiryakioğlu [3] models for the ts λ2 relationship to their dataset and reported that both models overestimated λ2 significantly. We note that Correa et al. used a surface tension value of 1.29 N/ m, rather than the solid–liquid interfacial energy, in their calculations. This is consistent with their previous studies [4]. We contend that the approach taken by Correa et al. is erroneous on account of the following reasons:","PeriodicalId":19860,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Magazine Letters","volume":"102 1","pages":"35 - 39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Magazine Letters","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09500839.2021.1994160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recently, Correa et al. [1] conducted experiments on the relationship between solidification parameters, including solidification time ts and secondary dendrite arm spacing λ2, for an Al-3wt.%Cu-3wt.%Ni alloy. Their data for the ts λ2 relationship are presented in Figure 1. Note that there are two regions with very different slopes (i.e. the exponent of ts). The fit to the data by Correa et al. is presented in the figure. Note that the slope in the trend of the data, i.e. the exponent of solidification time, is 0.076 below ts = 70 s – a value significantly less than 1/3. At longer solidification times, the exponent of the solidification time is 0.251, a value approaching 1/3, which is consistent with coarsening. The reason for the existence of two distinct regions is unknown. Correa et al. applied the Rappaz-Boettinger [2] and Tiryakioğlu [3] models for the ts λ2 relationship to their dataset and reported that both models overestimated λ2 significantly. We note that Correa et al. used a surface tension value of 1.29 N/ m, rather than the solid–liquid interfacial energy, in their calculations. This is consistent with their previous studies [4]. We contend that the approach taken by Correa et al. is erroneous on account of the following reasons:
期刊介绍:
Philosophical Magazine Letters is the rapid communications part of the highly respected Philosophical Magazine, which was first published in 1798. Its Editors consider for publication short and timely contributions in the field of condensed matter describing original results, theories and concepts relating to the structure and properties of crystalline materials, ceramics, polymers, glasses, amorphous films, composites and soft matter. Articles emphasizing experimental, theoretical and modelling studies on solids, especially those that interpret behaviour on a microscopic, atomic or electronic scale, are particularly appropriate.
Manuscripts are considered on the strict condition that they have been submitted only to Philosophical Magazine Letters , that they have not been published already, and that they are not under consideration for publication elsewhere.