Passagiere des Eises. Polarhelden und arktische Diskurse 1874 [Passengers of the Ice: Polar Heroes and Arctic Discourses, 1874]

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Marie-Theres Federhofer
{"title":"Passagiere des Eises. Polarhelden und arktische Diskurse 1874 [Passengers of the Ice: Polar Heroes and Arctic Discourses, 1874]","authors":"Marie-Theres Federhofer","doi":"10.1080/08003831.2015.1090161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"northern Europe, Germany and Austria. These build on the first great pan-European study of witchcraft, Bengt Ankarloo and Gustav Henningsen’s Early Modern European Witchcraft: Centres and Peripheries (which it is difficult to believe is over 20 years old, having been published in 1993). Although the descriptive rhetoric of centre and periphery is no longer particularly current, the notion of bringing together work on an ever-wider range of European (and global) witchcraft prosecutions is appealing. So is the notion of translating into English (for ignorant near-monoglots like myself) key studies from across the world, which could transform our understanding of the phenomena that contribute to accusation, prosecution and conviction. At the conference organized by Willumsen and Rita Voltmer in Tromsø last year, it certainly seemed that a renaissance of northern European witchcraft studies was in prospect, and perhaps a second wave of the enthusiasm that prompted Ankarloo and Henningsen’s enterprise in the early 1990s. Willumsen’s pioneering work, both the detailed local study and her theoretical stance on the necessity of comparison, is likely to be highly influential in such a desirable development.","PeriodicalId":44093,"journal":{"name":"Acta Borealia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08003831.2015.1090161","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Borealia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08003831.2015.1090161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

northern Europe, Germany and Austria. These build on the first great pan-European study of witchcraft, Bengt Ankarloo and Gustav Henningsen’s Early Modern European Witchcraft: Centres and Peripheries (which it is difficult to believe is over 20 years old, having been published in 1993). Although the descriptive rhetoric of centre and periphery is no longer particularly current, the notion of bringing together work on an ever-wider range of European (and global) witchcraft prosecutions is appealing. So is the notion of translating into English (for ignorant near-monoglots like myself) key studies from across the world, which could transform our understanding of the phenomena that contribute to accusation, prosecution and conviction. At the conference organized by Willumsen and Rita Voltmer in Tromsø last year, it certainly seemed that a renaissance of northern European witchcraft studies was in prospect, and perhaps a second wave of the enthusiasm that prompted Ankarloo and Henningsen’s enterprise in the early 1990s. Willumsen’s pioneering work, both the detailed local study and her theoretical stance on the necessity of comparison, is likely to be highly influential in such a desirable development.
Passagiere des Eises。《冰上的乘客:极地英雄与北极话语》,1874
北欧,德国和奥地利。本格特·安卡洛和古斯塔夫·亨宁森的《早期现代欧洲巫术:中心和外围》是第一部伟大的泛欧洲巫术研究的基础(很难相信这本书出版于1993年,已有20多年的历史)。尽管对中心和边缘的描述不再特别流行,但将欧洲(和全球)范围更广的巫术起诉工作汇集在一起的想法很有吸引力。将来自世界各地的重要研究成果翻译成英语(对于像我这样无知的几乎只会说一种语言的人来说)的想法也是如此,这可能会改变我们对导致指控、起诉和定罪的现象的理解。在去年由Willumsen和Rita volmer在特罗姆瑟组织的会议上,北欧巫术研究的复兴似乎是有希望的,也许第二波热情促使了Ankarloo和Henningsen在20世纪90年代初的事业。Willumsen的开创性工作,无论是详细的地方研究还是她对比较必要性的理论立场,都可能对这一理想的发展产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Borealia
Acta Borealia HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信