Role of percutaneous nephrostomy in cancer patients

IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
J. Ferraz-Gonçalves, Iolanda Vieira, Lígia Santos, Camila Oliveira
{"title":"Role of percutaneous nephrostomy in cancer patients","authors":"J. Ferraz-Gonçalves, Iolanda Vieira, Lígia Santos, Camila Oliveira","doi":"10.1080/09699260.2023.2249667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ureteric obstruction is common in cancer patients, representing an unfavorable prognostic factor in this population. Percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) is often performed in these patients to prevent renal dysfunction and potentially increase survival. However, this procedure may negatively affect patients’ quality of life, and its survival benefit is not established. The objective is to characterize the population of cancer patients undergoing PCN, assess complications related to PCN, and identify potential prognostic factors in this population. Ninety-two patients were included; the median age was 70 years (range: 26–85), and 55 (60%) were males. Most patients had metastatic disease (n = 51; 55%). Bladder (n = 24; 26%), prostate (n = 15; 16%), and rectum (n = 10; 11%) were the most frequent primary tumor topographies. Twenty-seven patients (29%) had NPC-related complications, 16 (17%) had more than one complication, and 20 (22%) required hospitalization. The most frequent complications were infection (n = 23; 25%) and obstruction (n = 14; 15%). In the multivariate analysis, malignant obstructive uropathy was the only independent prognostic factor post-PCN. After three years of follow-up, 70 patients (76%) had died, mainly from cancer progression, and 2 (2%) due to PCN-related complications. Given the potential benefits and burdens, patients and, in some cases, family members should be involved in the decision. The problem is not the efficacy of PCN but the adequacy of the decision in the face of a limited life expectancy.","PeriodicalId":45106,"journal":{"name":"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2023.2249667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ureteric obstruction is common in cancer patients, representing an unfavorable prognostic factor in this population. Percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) is often performed in these patients to prevent renal dysfunction and potentially increase survival. However, this procedure may negatively affect patients’ quality of life, and its survival benefit is not established. The objective is to characterize the population of cancer patients undergoing PCN, assess complications related to PCN, and identify potential prognostic factors in this population. Ninety-two patients were included; the median age was 70 years (range: 26–85), and 55 (60%) were males. Most patients had metastatic disease (n = 51; 55%). Bladder (n = 24; 26%), prostate (n = 15; 16%), and rectum (n = 10; 11%) were the most frequent primary tumor topographies. Twenty-seven patients (29%) had NPC-related complications, 16 (17%) had more than one complication, and 20 (22%) required hospitalization. The most frequent complications were infection (n = 23; 25%) and obstruction (n = 14; 15%). In the multivariate analysis, malignant obstructive uropathy was the only independent prognostic factor post-PCN. After three years of follow-up, 70 patients (76%) had died, mainly from cancer progression, and 2 (2%) due to PCN-related complications. Given the potential benefits and burdens, patients and, in some cases, family members should be involved in the decision. The problem is not the efficacy of PCN but the adequacy of the decision in the face of a limited life expectancy.
经皮肾造口术在癌症患者中的作用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE
PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Progress in Palliative Care is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal with an international perspective. It provides a central point of reference for all members of the palliative care community: medical consultants, nurses, hospital support teams, home care teams, hospice directors and administrators, pain centre staff, social workers, chaplains, counsellors, information staff, paramedical staff and self-help groups. The emphasis of the journal is on the rapid exchange of information amongst those working in palliative care. Progress in Palliative Care embraces all aspects of the management of the problems of end-stage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信