The “music city” paradigm and its policy side: a focus on Brisbane and Melbourne

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES
Sébastien Darchen, John Willsteed, Yanto Browning
{"title":"The “music city” paradigm and its policy side: a focus on Brisbane and Melbourne","authors":"Sébastien Darchen, John Willsteed, Yanto Browning","doi":"10.1080/09548963.2022.2062565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article critically reviews the edited collection Music Cities: Evaluating a Global Cultural Policy Concept published in 2020 as well as two Australian policy documents. We review how the music city paradigm has influenced the latest music-related policies in the Australian context with a focus on Brisbane and Melbourne. Melbourne and Brisbane have developed contrasting approaches that came about to address the same issue: encroaching gentrification impacting the viability of live music venues. We also highlight that policies derived from the music city paradigm focus on the live music city and not on the city as a site of music production. Ultimately, this might not be the best approach to foster resilient music scenes, especially in a global pandemic context.","PeriodicalId":51682,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Trends","volume":"32 1","pages":"296 - 310"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Trends","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2022.2062565","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article critically reviews the edited collection Music Cities: Evaluating a Global Cultural Policy Concept published in 2020 as well as two Australian policy documents. We review how the music city paradigm has influenced the latest music-related policies in the Australian context with a focus on Brisbane and Melbourne. Melbourne and Brisbane have developed contrasting approaches that came about to address the same issue: encroaching gentrification impacting the viability of live music venues. We also highlight that policies derived from the music city paradigm focus on the live music city and not on the city as a site of music production. Ultimately, this might not be the best approach to foster resilient music scenes, especially in a global pandemic context.
“音乐之城”范式及其政策层面:以布里斯班和墨尔本为例
本文批判性地回顾了编辑后的《音乐城市:评估2020年出版的全球文化政策概念》以及两份澳大利亚政策文件。我们以布里斯班和墨尔本为重点,回顾了音乐城市范式如何影响澳大利亚最新的音乐相关政策。墨尔本和布里斯班已经开发出了截然不同的方法来解决同样的问题:蚕食的中产阶级化影响了现场音乐场所的生存能力。我们还强调,源自音乐城范例的政策侧重于现场音乐城市,而不是将城市作为音乐制作的场所。最终,这可能不是培养弹性音乐场景的最佳方法,尤其是在全球大流行的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cultural Trends
Cultural Trends Multiple-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
16.10%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信