Close encounters of the third code: quantitative vs. qualitative studies in corpus-based translation studies

Q2 Arts and Humanities
R. Loock
{"title":"Close encounters of the third code: quantitative vs. qualitative studies in corpus-based translation studies","authors":"R. Loock","doi":"10.1075/BJL.27.04LOO","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article is to complement a quantitative study on existential constructions in French and English, both in translated and original texts and based on the exploitation of comparable corpora (Cappelle & Loock 2013). What this article shows is that such an overall quantitative approach should be complemented with a more qualitative approach, for two main reasons: (i) overall quantitative results provide only a general view on the differences between translated texts and original texts, hiding subtle but crucial variations; (ii) the use of comparable corpora does not provide any information on the strategies used by translators and on the translation process itself. The article also provides suggestions for implications in translator training and translation quality assessment.","PeriodicalId":35124,"journal":{"name":"Belgian Journal of Linguistics","volume":"27 1","pages":"61-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1075/BJL.27.04LOO","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Belgian Journal of Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/BJL.27.04LOO","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The aim of the article is to complement a quantitative study on existential constructions in French and English, both in translated and original texts and based on the exploitation of comparable corpora (Cappelle & Loock 2013). What this article shows is that such an overall quantitative approach should be complemented with a more qualitative approach, for two main reasons: (i) overall quantitative results provide only a general view on the differences between translated texts and original texts, hiding subtle but crucial variations; (ii) the use of comparable corpora does not provide any information on the strategies used by translators and on the translation process itself. The article also provides suggestions for implications in translator training and translation quality assessment.
第三码的近距离接触:基于语料库的翻译研究中的定量与定性研究
本文的目的是补充对法语和英语存在主义结构的定量研究,包括翻译文本和原文,并基于对可比语料库的利用(Cappelle & lock 2013)。本文表明,这种整体的定量方法应该与更定性的方法相辅相成,主要有两个原因:(1)整体的定量结果只能提供对翻译文本和原文之间差异的一般看法,隐藏了微妙但至关重要的差异;(二)可比性语料库的使用不能提供译者所使用的翻译策略和翻译过程本身的任何信息。本文还对译者培训和翻译质量评估提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Belgian Journal of Linguistics
Belgian Journal of Linguistics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The Belgian Journal of Linguistics is the annual publication of the Linguistic Society of Belgium and includes selected contributions from the international meetings organized by the LSB. Its volumes are topical and address a wide range of subjects in different fields of linguistics and neighboring disciplines (e.g. translation, poetics, political discourse). The BJL transcends its local basis, not only through the international orientation of its active advisory board, but also by inviting international scholars, both to act as guest editors and to contribute original papers. Articles go through an external and discriminating review process with due attention to ensuring the maintenance of the journal"s high-quality content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信