Patient participation: the impact of diagnosis and individual characteristics

IF 7.4 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Mary E. Schramm, T. Chowdhury, Myra Odenwaelder, Eunice A. Lisk
{"title":"Patient participation: the impact of diagnosis and individual characteristics","authors":"Mary E. Schramm, T. Chowdhury, Myra Odenwaelder, Eunice A. Lisk","doi":"10.1080/02642069.2021.1902993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Despite the interest in encouraging patients to participate in their care, knowledge of the relationship between patients’ characteristics and the extent to which they want to participate in their care is limited. Failure to consider preferences may negate the purported benefits of participation. Drawing on Self-Efficacy Theory, our multi-method study addresses this gap in the literature by studying patient preference for a prescribed versus a patient designed wellness program, as a function of individual self-efficacy and health skills, for diabetes and cancer patients. Using an experimental approach, we contribute to Self-Efficacy Theory by finding that disease seriousness impacts the expected interaction between self-efficacy and health skills in wellness program choice. The expected interaction held for diabetes patients but not for cancer patients. Differences between diabetes and cancer patients may reflect the relative psychological distress and the heightened importance of effective treatment that were revealed in patient interviews.","PeriodicalId":48173,"journal":{"name":"Service Industries Journal","volume":"43 1","pages":"989 - 1009"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02642069.2021.1902993","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Service Industries Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2021.1902993","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite the interest in encouraging patients to participate in their care, knowledge of the relationship between patients’ characteristics and the extent to which they want to participate in their care is limited. Failure to consider preferences may negate the purported benefits of participation. Drawing on Self-Efficacy Theory, our multi-method study addresses this gap in the literature by studying patient preference for a prescribed versus a patient designed wellness program, as a function of individual self-efficacy and health skills, for diabetes and cancer patients. Using an experimental approach, we contribute to Self-Efficacy Theory by finding that disease seriousness impacts the expected interaction between self-efficacy and health skills in wellness program choice. The expected interaction held for diabetes patients but not for cancer patients. Differences between diabetes and cancer patients may reflect the relative psychological distress and the heightened importance of effective treatment that were revealed in patient interviews.
患者参与:诊断和个体特征的影响
尽管有兴趣鼓励患者参与他们的护理,了解患者的特点和他们想要参与他们的护理的程度之间的关系是有限的。不考虑偏好可能会否定参与的所谓好处。根据自我效能理论,我们的多方法研究通过研究糖尿病和癌症患者对处方和患者设计的健康计划的偏好,作为个体自我效能和健康技能的函数,解决了文献中的这一空白。通过实验方法,我们发现疾病严重程度影响健康计划选择中自我效能感与健康技能之间的预期相互作用,从而为自我效能理论做出贡献。预期的相互作用适用于糖尿病患者,但不适用于癌症患者。糖尿病和癌症患者之间的差异可能反映了患者访谈中揭示的相对心理困扰和有效治疗的高度重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
18.10%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The mission of The Service Industries Journal is to enhance our understanding of the services sector, service firms, and the efficient management of these entities. Pioneering the field since 1981, we stand as the world's inaugural academic, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the services sector and service management. Over the years, we have earned a prestigious international reputation for delivering high-quality content and insights. We enthusiastically invite submissions from researchers worldwide whose studies are grounded in social sciences such as sociology, psychology, economics, law, and politics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信