‘But Let Us Remember Him Then and Never Forget…’ - The Dilution of Satyagraha in South Africa

S. Couper
{"title":"‘But Let Us Remember Him Then and Never Forget…’ - The Dilution of Satyagraha in South Africa","authors":"S. Couper","doi":"10.1080/02590123.2013.11964197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author posits that Satyagraha (‘a force that comes from truth, love and non-violence’) as a concept and practice suffered three dilutions in South Africa. The first occurred in 1961 when Nelson Mandela launched Umkhonto we Sizwe (MK) without the African National Congress (ANC) or Albert Luthuli's knowledge or support. Mandela's insubordination placed the ANC, in his own words, “on a new and more dangerous path”. Satyagraha's second dilution began in 1967 when South African nationalist historiography began to mythologise the past by articulating that Luthuli, arguably the quintessential satyagrahi, approved of and supported the armed struggle. Satyagraha's third dilution began in 2003 when the Gandhi Development Trust began, through the Satyagraha Award, to link Satyagraha with those who launched MK and thus chose violent methods to liberate South Africa. The author argues that bestowing the Satyagraha Award upon those who themselves claim no spiritual, ethical or strategic allegiance to Satyagraha dilutes the Award's potency to advocate for non-violent methods. The author challenges morally confused associations adopted by defenders of a sanitised history and claims that merely striving for a non-violent and peaceful society does not therefore, by default, qualify one as a proponent or practitioner of Satyagraha. The author cautions against grafting Satyagraha to the ANC's struggle against Apartheid post-1961. Such an incongruous fusion often demonstrates an allegiance to a certain outcome (freedom) at any cost or to a political party rather than to Satyagraha's values. The moral confusion is painfully evident in today's violent South African society.","PeriodicalId":88545,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natal and Zulu history","volume":"31 1","pages":"115 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02590123.2013.11964197","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natal and Zulu history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02590123.2013.11964197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author posits that Satyagraha (‘a force that comes from truth, love and non-violence’) as a concept and practice suffered three dilutions in South Africa. The first occurred in 1961 when Nelson Mandela launched Umkhonto we Sizwe (MK) without the African National Congress (ANC) or Albert Luthuli's knowledge or support. Mandela's insubordination placed the ANC, in his own words, “on a new and more dangerous path”. Satyagraha's second dilution began in 1967 when South African nationalist historiography began to mythologise the past by articulating that Luthuli, arguably the quintessential satyagrahi, approved of and supported the armed struggle. Satyagraha's third dilution began in 2003 when the Gandhi Development Trust began, through the Satyagraha Award, to link Satyagraha with those who launched MK and thus chose violent methods to liberate South Africa. The author argues that bestowing the Satyagraha Award upon those who themselves claim no spiritual, ethical or strategic allegiance to Satyagraha dilutes the Award's potency to advocate for non-violent methods. The author challenges morally confused associations adopted by defenders of a sanitised history and claims that merely striving for a non-violent and peaceful society does not therefore, by default, qualify one as a proponent or practitioner of Satyagraha. The author cautions against grafting Satyagraha to the ANC's struggle against Apartheid post-1961. Such an incongruous fusion often demonstrates an allegiance to a certain outcome (freedom) at any cost or to a political party rather than to Satyagraha's values. The moral confusion is painfully evident in today's violent South African society.
“但让我们记住他,永远不要忘记……”——南非Satyagraha的淡化
作者认为,Satyagraha(“来自真理、爱和非暴力的力量”)作为一种概念和实践在南非遭受了三次稀释。第一次发生在1961年,当时纳尔逊·曼德拉在没有非洲人国民大会(ANC)或阿尔伯特·卢图利的知情或支持下发起了民族之矛。用曼德拉自己的话说,他的不服从让非国大“走上了一条新的、更危险的道路”。Satyagraha的第二次淡化始于1967年,当时南非民族主义史学开始通过阐明Luthuli(可以说是satyagrahi的典型代表)赞成并支持武装斗争而将过去神话化。Satyagraha的第三次稀释始于2003年,当时甘地发展信托基金开始通过Satyagraha奖,将Satyagraha与那些发起MK并因此选择暴力方法解放南非的人联系起来。作者认为,将Satyagraha奖授予那些自己在精神上、道德上或战略上都不效忠于Satyagraha的人,削弱了该奖项倡导非暴力方法的效力。作者对为净化历史辩护的人所采用的道德混乱的联系提出了质疑,并声称仅仅为非暴力和平的社会而奋斗并不因此就默认地使一个人有资格成为Satyagraha的支持者或实践者。作者警告不要将Satyagraha嫁接到1961年后非国大反对种族隔离的斗争中。这种不协调的融合往往表现出对某种结果(自由)的忠诚,不惜任何代价,或对政党的忠诚,而不是Satyagraha的价值观。这种道德上的困惑在当今暴力横行的南非社会中显而易见,令人痛苦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信